PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
3XFE.L vs. AMD3.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

3XFE.L vs. AMD3.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x Long Financials ETP Securities EUR (3XFE.L) and Leverage Shares 3x AMD ETP Securities (AMD3.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

3XFE.L vs. AMD3.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
3XFE.L
Leverage Shares 3x Long Financials ETP Securities EUR
-32.97%-0.13%87.68%8.62%-43.02%5.22%
AMD3.L
Leverage Shares 3x AMD ETP Securities
-45.27%45.61%-75.24%462.70%-97.39%17.59%
Different Trading Currencies

3XFE.L is traded in EUR, while AMD3.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the AMD3.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3XFE.L achieves a -32.97% return, which is significantly higher than AMD3.L's -45.27% return.


3XFE.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-13.61%
YTD
-32.97%
6M
-30.57%
1Y
-29.72%
3Y*
21.63%
5Y*
10Y*

AMD3.L

1D
-3.52%
1M
-9.32%
YTD
-45.27%
6M
-13.91%
1Y
80.69%
3Y*
-25.89%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


3XFE.L vs. AMD3.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both 3XFE.L and AMD3.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Return for Risk

3XFE.L vs. AMD3.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3XFE.L
3XFE.L Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
3XFE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3XFE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
3XFE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
3XFE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
3XFE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank

AMD3.L
AMD3.L Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
AMD3.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMD3.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMD3.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
AMD3.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMD3.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3XFE.L vs. AMD3.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Long Financials ETP Securities EUR (3XFE.L) and Leverage Shares 3x AMD ETP Securities (AMD3.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


3XFE.LAMD3.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.53

0.46

-0.99

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.48

1.92

-2.40

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

1.24

-0.30

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.82

0.99

-1.81

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-2.04

1.80

-3.85

3XFE.L vs. AMD3.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3XFE.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.53, which is lower than the AMD3.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3XFE.L and AMD3.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


3XFE.LAMD3.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.53

0.46

-0.99

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.08

-0.22

+0.13

Correlation

The correlation between 3XFE.L and AMD3.L is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

3XFE.L vs. AMD3.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 3XFE.L nor AMD3.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

3XFE.L vs. AMD3.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3XFE.L drawdown since its inception was -66.97%, smaller than the maximum AMD3.L drawdown of -99.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3XFE.L and AMD3.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


3XFE.LAMD3.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.97%

-99.50%

+32.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.56%

-76.17%

+37.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-44.86%

-97.95%

+53.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.50%

-83.36%

+47.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.57%

41.07%

-25.50%

Volatility

3XFE.L vs. AMD3.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Leverage Shares 3x Long Financials ETP Securities EUR (3XFE.L) is 13.10%, while Leverage Shares 3x AMD ETP Securities (AMD3.L) has a volatility of 37.72%. This indicates that 3XFE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMD3.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


3XFE.LAMD3.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.10%

37.72%

-24.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.36%

140.64%

-109.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

55.47%

175.91%

-120.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

54.75%

151.87%

-97.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

54.75%

151.87%

-97.12%