3XFE.L vs. 3ABN.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Leverage Shares 3x Long Financials ETP Securities EUR (3XFE.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Airbnb ETP Securities GBP (3ABN.L).
3XFE.L and 3ABN.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. 3XFE.L is an actively managed fund by Leverage Shares. It was launched on Dec 10, 2021. 3ABN.L is a passively managed fund by Leverage Shares that tracks the performance of the iSTOXX Leveraged 3x ABNB Index. It was launched on Jun 14, 2021.
Performance
3XFE.L vs. 3ABN.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
3XFE.L vs. 3ABN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3XFE.L Leverage Shares 3x Long Financials ETP Securities EUR | -29.61% | -0.13% | 87.68% | 8.62% | -43.02% | 5.22% |
3ABN.L Leverage Shares 3x Airbnb ETP Securities GBP | -29.52% | 12,090.08% | -43.36% | 110.69% | -96.31% | 5.16% |
Different Trading Currencies
3XFE.L is traded in EUR, while 3ABN.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the 3ABN.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 3XFE.L achieves a -29.61% return, which is significantly higher than 3ABN.L's -33.88% return.
3XFE.L
- 1D
- 5.01%
- 1M
- -8.48%
- YTD
- -29.61%
- 6M
- -27.38%
- 1Y
- -28.37%
- 3Y*
- 23.63%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
3ABN.L
- 1D
- -2.62%
- 1M
- -26.19%
- YTD
- -33.88%
- 6M
- -14.17%
- 1Y
- 14,460.74%
- 3Y*
- 234.79%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
3XFE.L vs. 3ABN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both 3XFE.L and 3ABN.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.
Return for Risk
3XFE.L vs. 3ABN.L — Risk / Return Rank
3XFE.L
3ABN.L
3XFE.L vs. 3ABN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Long Financials ETP Securities EUR (3XFE.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Airbnb ETP Securities GBP (3ABN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 3XFE.L | 3ABN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.51 | 0.64 | -1.15 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.43 | 323.50 | -323.93 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 40.57 | -39.63 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.75 | 232.95 | -233.70 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -2.03 | 376.37 | -378.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 3XFE.L | 3ABN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.51 | 0.64 | -1.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.06 | 0.00 | -0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between 3XFE.L and 3ABN.L is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
3XFE.L vs. 3ABN.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither 3XFE.L nor 3ABN.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
3XFE.L vs. 3ABN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 3XFE.L drawdown since its inception was -66.97%, smaller than the maximum 3ABN.L drawdown of -99.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3XFE.L and 3ABN.L.
Loading graphics...
Volatility
3XFE.L vs. 3ABN.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Leverage Shares 3x Long Financials ETP Securities EUR (3XFE.L) is 14.16%, while Leverage Shares 3x Airbnb ETP Securities GBP (3ABN.L) has a volatility of 32.33%. This indicates that 3XFE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 3ABN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| 3XFE.L | 3ABN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.16% | 32.33% | -18.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.74% | 61.77% | -30.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.70% | 22,025.53% | -21,969.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 54.78% | 10,092.08% | -10,037.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.78% | 10,092.08% | -10,037.30% |