PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
3BP.L vs. 3AMD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

3BP.L vs. 3AMD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x BP ETP GBX (3BP.L) and Leverage Shares 3x AMD ETC GBP (3AMD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

3BP.L vs. 3AMD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
3BP.L
Leverage Shares 3x BP ETP GBX
146.96%16.83%-49.99%-15.24%58.02%-5.65%
3AMD.L
Leverage Shares 3x AMD ETC GBP
-45.05%53.77%-76.38%448.82%-97.41%265.31%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3BP.L achieves a 146.96% return, which is significantly higher than 3AMD.L's -45.05% return.


3BP.L

1D
4.27%
1M
89.44%
YTD
146.96%
6M
144.98%
1Y
104.90%
3Y*
0.36%
5Y*
18.94%
10Y*

3AMD.L

1D
-2.76%
1M
-9.65%
YTD
-45.05%
6M
-13.62%
1Y
89.07%
3Y*
-25.93%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


3BP.L vs. 3AMD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both 3BP.L and 3AMD.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Return for Risk

3BP.L vs. 3AMD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3BP.L
3BP.L Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
3BP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3BP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
3BP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
3BP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
3BP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

3AMD.L
3AMD.L Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
3AMD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3AMD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
3AMD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
3AMD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
3AMD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3BP.L vs. 3AMD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x BP ETP GBX (3BP.L) and Leverage Shares 3x AMD ETC GBP (3AMD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


3BP.L3AMD.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.18

0.51

+0.67

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.73

1.95

-0.22

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.25

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.84

1.10

+0.74

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.16

2.01

+2.14

3BP.L vs. 3AMD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3BP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is higher than the 3AMD.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3BP.L and 3AMD.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


3BP.L3AMD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.18

0.51

+0.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

-0.25

+0.41

Correlation

The correlation between 3BP.L and 3AMD.L is 0.10, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

3BP.L vs. 3AMD.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 3BP.L nor 3AMD.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

3BP.L vs. 3AMD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3BP.L drawdown since its inception was -85.47%, smaller than the maximum 3AMD.L drawdown of -99.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3BP.L and 3AMD.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


3BP.L3AMD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.47%

-99.50%

+14.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-59.39%

-76.34%

+16.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-85.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.21%

-97.92%

+72.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.73%

-84.85%

+41.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

26.24%

41.54%

-15.30%

Volatility

3BP.L vs. 3AMD.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Leverage Shares 3x BP ETP GBX (3BP.L) is 30.92%, while Leverage Shares 3x AMD ETC GBP (3AMD.L) has a volatility of 37.47%. This indicates that 3BP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 3AMD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


3BP.L3AMD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

30.92%

37.47%

-6.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

60.31%

140.12%

-79.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

88.68%

174.34%

-85.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

89.19%

153.89%

-64.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

89.22%

153.89%

-64.67%