PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
3VT.L vs. 3XFE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

3VT.L vs. 3XFE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x Long Total World ETP Securities GBP (3VT.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long Financials ETP Securities EUR (3XFE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

3VT.L is traded in GBp, while 3XFE.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the 3XFE.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3VT.L achieves a 27.78% return, which is significantly higher than 3XFE.L's -28.62% return.


3VT.L

1D
-1.52%
1M
12.90%
YTD
27.78%
6M
30.70%
1Y
75.80%
3Y*
37.91%
5Y*
10Y*

3XFE.L

1D
-4.51%
1M
-10.07%
YTD
-28.62%
6M
-22.20%
1Y
-18.25%
3Y*
22.76%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

3VT.L vs. 3XFE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
3VT.L
Leverage Shares 3x Long Total World ETP Securities GBP
27.78%28.59%32.38%43.18%-49.57%0.00%
3XFE.L
Leverage Shares 3x Long Financials ETP Securities EUR
-28.62%5.22%79.15%6.45%-39.90%3.68%

Correlation

The correlation between 3VT.L and 3XFE.L is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2021

0.61

The correlation between 3VT.L and 3XFE.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

3VT.L vs. 3XFE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3VT.L
3VT.L Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
3VT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3VT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
3VT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
3VT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
3VT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

3XFE.L
3XFE.L Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
3XFE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3XFE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
3XFE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
3XFE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
3XFE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3VT.L vs. 3XFE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Long Total World ETP Securities GBP (3VT.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long Financials ETP Securities EUR (3XFE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


3VT.L3XFE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

0.96

+0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.85

-0.47

+3.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.77

-1.05

+11.82

3VT.L vs. 3XFE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3VT.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is higher than the 3XFE.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3VT.L and 3XFE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


3VT.L3XFE.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.08

-0.44

+2.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

-0.05

+0.29

Drawdowns

3VT.L vs. 3XFE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3VT.L drawdown since its inception was -58.87%, smaller than the maximum 3XFE.L drawdown of -65.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3VT.L and 3XFE.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


3VT.L3XFE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.87%

-65.23%

+6.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.47%

-38.39%

+11.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-46.37%

-48.16%

+1.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.52%

-38.70%

+37.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.23%

-34.06%

+8.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.02%

17.34%

-10.32%

Volatility

3VT.L vs. 3XFE.L - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 3x Long Total World ETP Securities GBP (3VT.L) has a higher volatility of 10.47% compared to Leverage Shares 3x Long Financials ETP Securities EUR (3XFE.L) at 9.69%. This indicates that 3VT.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 3XFE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


3VT.L3XFE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.47%

9.69%

+0.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.81%

30.23%

-1.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.37%

40.94%

-4.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

47.86%

53.73%

-5.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.86%

53.73%

-5.87%

3VT.L vs. 3XFE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both 3VT.L and 3XFE.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

3VT.L vs. 3XFE.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 3VT.L nor 3XFE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


3VT.L and 3XFE.L have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

3VT.L and 3XFE.L have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 3VT.L and 3XFE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer