3VT.L vs. ^GSPC
3VT.L (Leverage Shares 3x Long Total World ETP Securities GBP) is Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while ^GSPC (S&P 500 Index) is an index. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
3VT.L vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
3VT.L is traded in GBp, while ^GSPC is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ^GSPC values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
3VT.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -4.82%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
^GSPC
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.11%
- 6M
- 7.74%
- YTD
- 10.02%
- 1Y
- 19.10%
- 3Y*
- 16.96%
- 5Y*
- 12.20%
- 10Y*
- 12.96%
3VT.L vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
3VT.L Leverage Shares 3x Long Total World ETP Securities GBP | 30.15% |
^GSPC S&P 500 Index | 10.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between 3VT.L and ^GSPC is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2026 | 0.67 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
3VT.L vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank
3VT.L
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
^GSPC
3VT.L vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Long Total World ETP Securities GBP (3VT.L) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| 3VT.L | ^GSPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.30 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.39 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.68 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
3VT.L vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 3VT.L drawdown since its inception was -11.41%, smaller than the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -37.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3VT.L and ^GSPC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 3VT.L | ^GSPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.41% | -37.07% | +25.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.15% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.15% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -26.01% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.62% | -1.55% | -5.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.34% | -5.29% | +1.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.20% | — |
Volatility
3VT.L vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 3VT.L | ^GSPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.89% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.97% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.59% | 12.03% | +29.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.59% | 15.96% | +25.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.59% | 18.05% | +23.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
3VT.L and ^GSPC have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for 3VT.L and ^GSPC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer