PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
3SUE.DE vs. GLUX.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

3SUE.DE vs. GLUX.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI World Consumer Staples Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist (3SUE.DE) and Amundi S&P Global Luxury UCITS ETF EUR (GLUX.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3SUE.DE achieves a 0.62% return, which is significantly higher than GLUX.DE's -7.03% return.


3SUE.DE

1D
-0.18%
1M
-3.06%
YTD
0.62%
6M
-0.36%
1Y
-3.57%
3Y*
0.49%
5Y*
3.31%
10Y*

GLUX.DE

1D
-0.12%
1M
1.10%
YTD
-7.03%
6M
-6.73%
1Y
3.68%
3Y*
-0.97%
5Y*
0.25%
10Y*
9.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

3SUE.DE vs. GLUX.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
3SUE.DE
iShares MSCI World Consumer Staples Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist
0.62%-6.04%9.20%-0.30%0.12%22.84%-0.67%3.33%
GLUX.DE
Amundi S&P Global Luxury UCITS ETF EUR
-7.03%2.34%4.43%11.98%-19.34%32.41%23.80%12.18%

Correlation

The correlation between 3SUE.DE and GLUX.DE is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2019

0.43

The correlation between 3SUE.DE and GLUX.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (1 year) to 0.43 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

3SUE.DE vs. GLUX.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3SUE.DE
3SUE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
3SUE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3SUE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
3SUE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
3SUE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
3SUE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

GLUX.DE
GLUX.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
GLUX.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLUX.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLUX.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
GLUX.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLUX.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3SUE.DE vs. GLUX.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World Consumer Staples Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist (3SUE.DE) and Amundi S&P Global Luxury UCITS ETF EUR (GLUX.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


3SUE.DEGLUX.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

1.04

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.41

0.16

-0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.91

0.39

-1.30

3SUE.DE vs. GLUX.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3SUE.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.38, which is lower than the GLUX.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3SUE.DE and GLUX.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


3SUE.DEGLUX.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.38

0.13

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

0.01

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.44

-0.13

Drawdowns

3SUE.DE vs. GLUX.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3SUE.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.98%, smaller than the maximum GLUX.DE drawdown of -43.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3SUE.DE and GLUX.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


3SUE.DEGLUX.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.98%

-43.20%

+20.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.93%

-16.00%

+5.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.04%

-27.94%

+14.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.04%

-30.52%

+17.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.63%

-14.70%

+4.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.61%

-9.35%

+3.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.97%

6.51%

-1.54%

Volatility

3SUE.DE vs. GLUX.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI World Consumer Staples Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist (3SUE.DE) is 4.88%, while Amundi S&P Global Luxury UCITS ETF EUR (GLUX.DE) has a volatility of 5.55%. This indicates that 3SUE.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLUX.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


3SUE.DEGLUX.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.88%

5.55%

-0.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.87%

15.60%

-5.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.05%

19.60%

-7.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.43%

21.08%

-9.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.09%

20.94%

-7.85%

3SUE.DE vs. GLUX.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

3SUE.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than GLUX.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

3SUE.DE vs. GLUX.DE - Dividend Comparison

3SUE.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%, while GLUX.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
3SUE.DE
iShares MSCI World Consumer Staples Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist
2.62%2.64%2.63%2.44%2.21%2.43%3.30%0.40%
GLUX.DE
Amundi S&P Global Luxury UCITS ETF EUR
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


3SUE.DE and GLUX.DE have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, 3SUE.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

3SUE.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for GLUX.DE.

3SUE.DE tracks MSCI World Consumer Staples, while GLUX.DE tracks S&P Global Luxury. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for 3SUE.DE and 0.25% for GLUX.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 3SUE.DE and GLUX.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer