3PLT.L vs. 3XLE.L
3PLT.L (Leverage Shares 3x Palantir ETP Securities) and 3XLE.L (Leverage Shares 3x Long Oil & Gas ETP Securities GBP) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Leverage Shares. 3PLT.L is passively managed, while 3XLE.L is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, 3PLT.L returned 156.05%/yr vs 15.13%/yr for 3XLE.L. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.
Performance
3PLT.L vs. 3XLE.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 3PLT.L achieves a -67.40% return, which is significantly lower than 3XLE.L's 98.06% return.
3PLT.L
- 1D
- -10.34%
- 1M
- -6.09%
- YTD
- -67.40%
- 6M
- -65.26%
- 1Y
- -49.99%
- 3Y*
- 156.05%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
3XLE.L
- 1D
- 6.81%
- 1M
- -1.92%
- YTD
- 98.06%
- 6M
- 87.16%
- 1Y
- 122.22%
- 3Y*
- 15.13%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
3PLT.L vs. 3XLE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3PLT.L Leverage Shares 3x Palantir ETP Securities | -67.40% | 154.21% | 2,527.55% | 363.59% | -99.42% | -3.74% |
3XLE.L Leverage Shares 3x Long Oil & Gas ETP Securities GBP | 98.06% | -17.73% | -12.65% | -29.34% | 191.33% | -3.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between 3PLT.L and 3XLE.L is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2021 | 0.10 |
The correlation between 3PLT.L and 3XLE.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.10 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
3PLT.L vs. 3XLE.L — Risk / Return Rank
3PLT.L
3XLE.L
3PLT.L vs. 3XLE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Palantir ETP Securities (3PLT.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long Oil & Gas ETP Securities GBP (3XLE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 3PLT.L | 3XLE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.29 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.58 | 3.10 | -3.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.95 | 8.55 | -9.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 3PLT.L | 3XLE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.33 | 1.82 | -2.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.15 | 0.34 | -0.49 |
Drawdowns
3PLT.L vs. 3XLE.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 3PLT.L drawdown since its inception was -99.89%, which is greater than 3XLE.L's maximum drawdown of -74.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3PLT.L and 3XLE.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 3PLT.L | 3XLE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.89% | -74.89% | -25.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -85.49% | -39.26% | -46.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -86.37% | -66.05% | -20.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -87.19% | -31.69% | -55.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -84.65% | -45.07% | -39.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 52.77% | 14.25% | +38.52% |
Volatility
3PLT.L vs. 3XLE.L - Volatility Comparison
Leverage Shares 3x Palantir ETP Securities (3PLT.L) has a higher volatility of 52.34% compared to Leverage Shares 3x Long Oil & Gas ETP Securities GBP (3XLE.L) at 25.62%. This indicates that 3PLT.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 3XLE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 3PLT.L | 3XLE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 52.34% | 25.62% | +26.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 109.30% | 57.75% | +51.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 150.17% | 67.19% | +82.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 193.72% | 82.23% | +111.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 193.72% | 82.23% | +111.49% |
3PLT.L vs. 3XLE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both 3PLT.L and 3XLE.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.
Dividends
3PLT.L vs. 3XLE.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither 3PLT.L nor 3XLE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
3PLT.L and 3XLE.L have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
3PLT.L and 3XLE.L have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.
Find the right allocation for 3PLT.L and 3XLE.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer