3MSF.L vs. 3MST.L
3MSF.L (Leverage Shares 3x Microsoft ETP GBP) and 3MST.L (Leverage Shares 3x Long MicroStrategy ETP) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Leverage Shares - 3MSF.L tracks the iSTOXX Leveraged 3X MSFT Index while 3MST.L tracks the Euronext 3x Long MicroStrategy Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, 3MSF.L returned -66.25% vs -24.55% for 3MST.L. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.
Performance
3MSF.L vs. 3MST.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
3MSF.L is traded in GBp, while 3MST.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the 3MST.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 3MSF.L achieves a -63.51% return, which is significantly lower than 3MST.L's 1,846.77% return.
3MSF.L
- 1D
- 1.96%
- 1M
- -31.68%
- YTD
- -63.51%
- 6M
- -63.49%
- 1Y
- -66.25%
- 3Y*
- -20.05%
- 5Y*
- -10.79%
- 10Y*
- —
3MST.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -70.08%
- YTD
- 1,846.77%
- 6M
- 1,730.58%
- 1Y
- -24.55%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
3MSF.L vs. 3MST.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
3MSF.L Leverage Shares 3x Microsoft ETP GBP | -63.51% | -1.14% | -4.23% |
3MST.L Leverage Shares 3x Long MicroStrategy ETP | 1,846.77% | -98.53% | 105.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between 3MSF.L and 3MST.L is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2024 | 0.32 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
3MSF.L vs. 3MST.L — Risk / Return Rank
3MSF.L
3MST.L
3MSF.L vs. 3MST.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Microsoft ETP GBP (3MSF.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long MicroStrategy ETP (3MST.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| 3MSF.L | 3MST.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -88.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | 10.24 | -9.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.87 | -0.25 | -0.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.42 | -0.33 | -1.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
3MSF.L vs. 3MST.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 3MSF.L drawdown since its inception was -81.42%, smaller than the maximum 3MST.L drawdown of -99.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3MSF.L and 3MST.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 3MSF.L | 3MST.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.42% | -99.94% | +18.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -76.35% | -99.48% | +23.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -76.35% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -81.42% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -75.88% | -95.00% | +19.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.56% | -83.53% | +47.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 46.50% | 74.61% | -28.11% |
Volatility
3MSF.L vs. 3MST.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Leverage Shares 3x Microsoft ETP GBP (3MSF.L) is 33.06%, while Leverage Shares 3x Long MicroStrategy ETP (3MST.L) has a volatility of 82.71%. This indicates that 3MSF.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 3MST.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 3MSF.L | 3MST.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 33.06% | 82.71% | -49.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 76.44% | 517.31% | -440.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 81.44% | 13,420.20% | -13,338.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 78.03% | 10,200.29% | -10,122.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 77.37% | 10,200.29% | -10,122.92% |
3MSF.L vs. 3MST.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both 3MSF.L and 3MST.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.
Dividends
3MSF.L vs. 3MST.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither 3MSF.L nor 3MST.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
3MSF.L and 3MST.L have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
3MSF.L and 3MST.L have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.
3MSF.L tracks iSTOXX Leveraged 3X MSFT Index, while 3MST.L tracks Euronext 3x Long MicroStrategy Index.
Find the right allocation for 3MSF.L and 3MST.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer