PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
3JPN.DE vs. LYMZ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

3JPN.DE vs. LYMZ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x Long Japan ETP Securities (3JPN.DE) and Amundi EURO STOXX 50 Daily (2x) Leveraged UCITS ETF (LYMZ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3JPN.DE achieves a 37.51% return, which is significantly higher than LYMZ.DE's 11.52% return.


3JPN.DE

1D
-0.77%
1M
7.20%
YTD
37.51%
6M
34.92%
1Y
72.37%
3Y*
20.30%
5Y*
10Y*

LYMZ.DE

1D
1.36%
1M
3.24%
YTD
11.52%
6M
14.06%
1Y
26.14%
3Y*
25.17%
5Y*
17.14%
10Y*
15.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

3JPN.DE vs. LYMZ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
3JPN.DE
Leverage Shares 3x Long Japan ETP Securities
37.51%27.74%0.10%34.83%0.88%
LYMZ.DE
Amundi EURO STOXX 50 Daily (2x) Leveraged UCITS ETF
11.52%39.84%15.21%41.48%11.83%

Correlation

The correlation between 3JPN.DE and LYMZ.DE is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2022

0.56

The correlation between 3JPN.DE and LYMZ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

3JPN.DE vs. LYMZ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3JPN.DE
3JPN.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
3JPN.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3JPN.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
3JPN.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
3JPN.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
3JPN.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

LYMZ.DE
LYMZ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
LYMZ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYMZ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYMZ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
LYMZ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYMZ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3JPN.DE vs. LYMZ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Long Japan ETP Securities (3JPN.DE) and Amundi EURO STOXX 50 Daily (2x) Leveraged UCITS ETF (LYMZ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


3JPN.DELYMZ.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.16

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.96

1.24

+0.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.61

3.96

+1.64

3JPN.DE vs. LYMZ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3JPN.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is higher than the LYMZ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3JPN.DE and LYMZ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


3JPN.DELYMZ.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.13

0.82

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.10

+0.40

Drawdowns

3JPN.DE vs. LYMZ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3JPN.DE drawdown since its inception was -51.65%, smaller than the maximum LYMZ.DE drawdown of -84.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3JPN.DE and LYMZ.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


3JPN.DELYMZ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.65%

-84.31%

+32.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.71%

-21.17%

-13.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-51.65%

-31.42%

-20.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.07%

-1.33%

-5.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.56%

-40.16%

+25.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.19%

6.63%

+5.56%

Volatility

3JPN.DE vs. LYMZ.DE - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 3x Long Japan ETP Securities (3JPN.DE) has a higher volatility of 11.68% compared to Amundi EURO STOXX 50 Daily (2x) Leveraged UCITS ETF (LYMZ.DE) at 9.89%. This indicates that 3JPN.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LYMZ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


3JPN.DELYMZ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.68%

9.89%

+1.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

48.68%

25.73%

+22.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

60.28%

31.86%

+28.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

52.77%

35.01%

+17.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

52.77%

36.32%

+16.45%

3JPN.DE vs. LYMZ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

3JPN.DE has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than LYMZ.DE's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

3JPN.DE vs. LYMZ.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither 3JPN.DE nor LYMZ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


3JPN.DE and LYMZ.DE have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LYMZ.DE is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LYMZ.DE is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 3JPN.DE.

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for 3JPN.DE and 0.40% for LYMZ.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 3JPN.DE and LYMZ.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer