3JPN.DE vs. BATG.DE

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Leverage Shares 3x Long Japan ETP Securities (3JPN.DE) and L&G Japan ESG Exclusions Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Accumulating ETF (BATG.DE).

3JPN.DE and BATG.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. 3JPN.DE is an actively managed fund by Leverage Shares. It was launched on Sep 13, 2022. BATG.DE is a passively managed fund by LGIM Managers (Europe) Limited that tracks the performance of the Foxberry Sustainability Consensus Japan. It was launched on Oct 20, 2022.

Performance

3JPN.DE vs. BATG.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x Long Japan ETP Securities (3JPN.DE) and L&G Japan ESG Exclusions Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Accumulating ETF (BATG.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

3JPN.DE vs. BATG.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
3JPN.DE Leverage Shares 3x Long Japan ETP Securities	15.45%	27.74%	0.10%	34.83%	16.84%
BATG.DE L&G Japan ESG Exclusions Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Accumulating ETF	0.00%	5.88%	12.80%	12.76%	1.17%

Returns By Period

3JPN.DE

• 1D: 16.25%
• 1M: -11.77%
• YTD: 15.45%
• 6M: 22.07%
• 1Y: 57.13%
• 3Y*: 19.71%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BATG.DE

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

3JPN.DE vs. BATG.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

3JPN.DE has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than BATG.DE's 0.16% expense ratio.

3JPN.DE

Leverage Shares 3x Long Japan ETP Securities

BATG.DE

L&G Japan ESG Exclusions Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Accumulating ETF

Return for Risk

3JPN.DE vs. BATG.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3JPN.DE

3JPN.DE Risk / Return Rank: 53
3JPN.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
3JPN.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
3JPN.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 51
3JPN.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
3JPN.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3JPN.DE vs. BATG.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Long Japan ETP Securities (3JPN.DE) and L&G Japan ESG Exclusions Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Accumulating ETF (BATG.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	3JPN.DE	BATG.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.90	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.55	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.73	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.83	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	3JPN.DE	BATG.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.41	—	—

Correlation

The correlation between 3JPN.DE and BATG.DE is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

3JPN.DE vs. BATG.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither 3JPN.DE nor BATG.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	3JPN.DE	BATG.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.65%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-34.71%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-21.98%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.47%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.32%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	3JPN.DE	BATG.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	28.82%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	46.72%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	62.92%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	52.07%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	52.07%	—	—