PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
3GOO.L vs. 3NIE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

3GOO.L vs. 3NIE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x Alphabet ETC GBP (3GOO.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long NIO ETP Securities (3NIE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

3GOO.L is traded in GBp, while 3NIE.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the 3NIE.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3GOO.L achieves a 34.83% return, which is significantly higher than 3NIE.L's -29.13% return.


3GOO.L

1D
8.98%
1M
-15.53%
YTD
34.83%
6M
27.25%
1Y
608.54%
3Y*
85.26%
5Y*
30.26%
10Y*

3NIE.L

1D
-2.04%
1M
-21.87%
YTD
-29.13%
6M
-14.88%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

3GOO.L vs. 3NIE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
3GOO.L
Leverage Shares 3x Alphabet ETC GBP
34.83%-10.65%
3NIE.L
Leverage Shares 3x Long NIO ETP Securities
-29.13%-23.05%

Correlation

The correlation between 3GOO.L and 3NIE.L is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 26, 2025

0.07

3GOO.L vs. 3NIE.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
3GOO.L
3NIE.L

Communication Services

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

100.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Communication Services

3GOO.L
100.0%
3NIE.L

-

Basic Materials

3GOO.L

-

3NIE.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

3GOO.L

-

3NIE.L
100.0%

Consumer Defensive

3GOO.L

-

3NIE.L

-

Energy

3GOO.L

-

3NIE.L

-

Financial Services

3GOO.L

-

3NIE.L

-

Healthcare

3GOO.L

-

3NIE.L

-

Industrials

3GOO.L

-

3NIE.L

-

Real Estate

3GOO.L

-

3NIE.L

-

Technology

3GOO.L

-

3NIE.L

-

Utilities

3GOO.L

-

3NIE.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

3GOO.L vs. 3NIE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3GOO.L
3GOO.L Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
3GOO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3GOO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
3GOO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
3GOO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
3GOO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

3NIE.L
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3GOO.L vs. 3NIE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Alphabet ETC GBP (3GOO.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long NIO ETP Securities (3NIE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


3GOO.L3NIE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.59

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

11.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

37.79

3GOO.L vs. 3NIE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


3GOO.L3NIE.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

-0.40

+0.95

Drawdowns

3GOO.L vs. 3NIE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3GOO.L drawdown since its inception was -88.06%, which is greater than 3NIE.L's maximum drawdown of -60.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3GOO.L and 3NIE.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


3GOO.L3NIE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.06%

-60.99%

-27.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-50.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-68.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-88.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.69%

-49.47%

+25.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.53%

-36.88%

-7.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.99%

Volatility

3GOO.L vs. 3NIE.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


3GOO.L3NIE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

53.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

83.45%

175.06%

-91.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

89.52%

175.06%

-85.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

89.77%

175.06%

-85.29%

3GOO.L vs. 3NIE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both 3GOO.L and 3NIE.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

3GOO.L vs. 3NIE.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 3GOO.L nor 3NIE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


3GOO.L and 3NIE.L have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

3GOO.L and 3NIE.L have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

3GOO.L tracks iSTOXX Leveraged 3X GOOG Index, while 3NIE.L tracks iSTOXX Leveraged 3x NIO Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 3GOO.L and 3NIE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer