PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
3GOO.L vs. 3AAP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

3GOO.L vs. 3AAP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x Alphabet ETC GBP (3GOO.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Apple ETP Securities GBP (3AAP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

3GOO.L vs. 3AAP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
3GOO.L
Leverage Shares 3x Alphabet ETC GBP
-23.13%146.08%80.34%154.87%-85.80%293.65%12.30%
3AAP.L
Leverage Shares 3x Apple ETP Securities GBP
-24.35%-28.23%70.02%151.70%-73.70%95.43%-2.97%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3GOO.L achieves a -23.13% return, which is significantly higher than 3AAP.L's -24.35% return.


3GOO.L

1D
13.71%
1M
-12.07%
YTD
-23.13%
6M
52.28%
1Y
299.77%
3Y*
86.81%
5Y*
24.91%
10Y*

3AAP.L

1D
5.91%
1M
-12.60%
YTD
-24.35%
6M
-13.65%
1Y
-8.43%
3Y*
7.98%
5Y*
11.33%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


3GOO.L vs. 3AAP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both 3GOO.L and 3AAP.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Return for Risk

3GOO.L vs. 3AAP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3GOO.L
3GOO.L Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
3GOO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3GOO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
3GOO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
3GOO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
3GOO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

3AAP.L
3AAP.L Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
3AAP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3AAP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
3AAP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
3AAP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
3AAP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3GOO.L vs. 3AAP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Alphabet ETC GBP (3GOO.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Apple ETP Securities GBP (3AAP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


3GOO.L3AAP.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.42

-0.08

+3.50

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.44

0.72

+2.72

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.10

+0.30

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

6.02

-0.23

+6.25

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

20.38

-0.45

+20.83

3GOO.L vs. 3AAP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3GOO.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.42, which is higher than the 3AAP.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3GOO.L and 3AAP.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


3GOO.L3AAP.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.42

-0.08

+3.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

0.13

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.29

+0.12

Correlation

The correlation between 3GOO.L and 3AAP.L is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

3GOO.L vs. 3AAP.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 3GOO.L nor 3AAP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

3GOO.L vs. 3AAP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3GOO.L drawdown since its inception was -88.06%, which is greater than 3AAP.L's maximum drawdown of -75.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3GOO.L and 3AAP.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


3GOO.L3AAP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.06%

-75.66%

-12.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-50.61%

-54.75%

+4.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-88.06%

-75.66%

-12.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-39.39%

-47.17%

+7.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-45.51%

-35.03%

-10.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.96%

22.48%

-7.52%

Volatility

3GOO.L vs. 3AAP.L - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 3x Alphabet ETC GBP (3GOO.L) has a higher volatility of 24.24% compared to Leverage Shares 3x Apple ETP Securities GBP (3AAP.L) at 16.34%. This indicates that 3GOO.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 3AAP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


3GOO.L3AAP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.24%

16.34%

+7.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

56.77%

61.99%

-5.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

87.43%

110.67%

-23.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

89.67%

86.72%

+2.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

89.83%

89.32%

+0.51%