PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
3GOO.L vs. 3GOE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

3GOO.L vs. 3GOE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x Alphabet ETC GBP (3GOO.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Alphabet ETP Scs (3GOE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

3GOO.L is traded in GBp, while 3GOE.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the 3GOE.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3GOO.L achieves a 7.47% return, which is significantly lower than 3GOE.L's 20.87% return.


3GOO.L

1D
-8.11%
1M
-30.66%
YTD
7.47%
6M
4.21%
1Y
434.77%
3Y*
83.55%
5Y*
20.12%
10Y*

3GOE.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-22.83%
YTD
20.87%
6M
17.58%
1Y
497.42%
3Y*
86.12%
5Y*
23.35%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

3GOO.L vs. 3GOE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
3GOO.L
Leverage Shares 3x Alphabet ETC GBP
7.47%146.08%80.34%154.87%-85.80%292.19%40.82%
3GOE.L
Leverage Shares 3x Alphabet ETP Scs
20.87%117.01%92.46%146.89%-84.96%324.04%29.92%

Correlation

The correlation between 3GOO.L and 3GOE.L is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2020

0.98

The correlation between 3GOO.L and 3GOE.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

3GOO.L vs. 3GOE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3GOO.L
3GOO.L Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
3GOO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3GOO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
3GOO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
3GOO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
3GOO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

3GOE.L
3GOE.L Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
3GOE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3GOE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
3GOE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
3GOE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
3GOE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3GOO.L vs. 3GOE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Alphabet ETC GBP (3GOO.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Alphabet ETP Scs (3GOE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


3GOO.L3GOE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.53

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.52

10.09

-1.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

25.06

29.55

-4.49

3GOO.L vs. 3GOE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3GOO.L Sharpe Ratio is 4.98, which is comparable to the 3GOE.L Sharpe Ratio of 5.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3GOO.L and 3GOE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

3GOO.L vs. 3GOE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3GOO.L drawdown since its inception was -88.06%, roughly equal to the maximum 3GOE.L drawdown of -87.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3GOO.L and 3GOE.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


3GOO.L3GOE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.06%

-87.19%

-0.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-50.61%

-49.28%

-1.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-68.88%

-70.65%

+1.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-88.06%

-87.19%

-0.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-39.18%

-32.26%

-6.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.82%

-41.88%

-0.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.24%

16.83%

+0.41%

Volatility

3GOO.L vs. 3GOE.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Leverage Shares 3x Alphabet ETC GBP (3GOO.L) is 30.36%, while Leverage Shares 3x Alphabet ETP Scs (3GOE.L) has a volatility of 36.48%. This indicates that 3GOO.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 3GOE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


3GOO.L3GOE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

30.36%

36.48%

-6.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

58.46%

61.40%

-2.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

86.76%

90.47%

-3.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

90.96%

89.83%

+1.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

89.22%

88.36%

+0.86%

3GOO.L vs. 3GOE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both 3GOO.L and 3GOE.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

3GOO.L vs. 3GOE.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 3GOO.L nor 3GOE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, 3GOO.L and 3GOE.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

3GOO.L and 3GOE.L have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

Both ETFs track iSTOXX Leveraged 3X GOOG Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 3GOO.L and 3GOE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer