3GDX.L vs. AGQ

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Leverage Shares 3x Long Gold Miners ETC (3GDX.L) and ProShares Ultra Silver (AGQ).

3GDX.L and AGQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. 3GDX.L is an actively managed fund by Leverage Shares. It was launched on Dec 10, 2021. AGQ is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Silver (200%). It was launched on Dec 1, 2008.

Performance

3GDX.L vs. AGQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x Long Gold Miners ETC (3GDX.L) and ProShares Ultra Silver (AGQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

3GDX.L vs. AGQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
3GDX.L Leverage Shares 3x Long Gold Miners ETC	1.78%	723.93%	-17.15%	-19.21%	-52.89%	16.47%
AGQ ProShares Ultra Silver	-23.34%	360.71%	23.92%	-15.09%	-7.89%	12.46%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3GDX.L achieves a 1.78% return, which is significantly higher than AGQ's -23.34% return.

3GDX.L

• 1D: 22.50%
• 1M: -45.15%
• YTD: 1.78%
• 6M: 17.27%
• 1Y: 278.66%
• 3Y*: 65.59%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AGQ

• 1D: -0.50%
• 1M: -32.70%
• YTD: -23.34%
• 6M: 51.96%
• 1Y: 163.54%
• 3Y*: 56.15%
• 5Y*: 22.66%
• 10Y*: 14.25%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

3GDX.L vs. AGQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

3GDX.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than AGQ's 0.93% expense ratio.

AGQ

ProShares Ultra Silver

3GDX.L

Leverage Shares 3x Long Gold Miners ETC

Return for Risk

3GDX.L vs. AGQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3GDX.L

3GDX.L Risk / Return Rank: 88
3GDX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
3GDX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
3GDX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 80
3GDX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
3GDX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 88

AGQ

AGQ Risk / Return Rank: 73
AGQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
AGQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
AGQ Omega Ratio Rank: 86
AGQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
AGQ Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3GDX.L vs. AGQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Long Gold Miners ETC (3GDX.L) and ProShares Ultra Silver (AGQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	3GDX.L	AGQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.09	1.40	+0.70
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.43	2.00	+0.43
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.35	-0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.20	2.07	+2.13
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	11.69	5.57	+6.12
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

3GDX.L vs. AGQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3GDX.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is higher than the AGQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3GDX.L and AGQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	3GDX.L	AGQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.09	1.40	+0.70
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.31	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.22	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.29	0.09	+0.20

Correlation

The correlation between 3GDX.L and AGQ is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

3GDX.L vs. AGQ - Dividend Comparison

Neither 3GDX.L nor AGQ has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

3GDX.L vs. AGQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3GDX.L drawdown since its inception was -89.13%, smaller than the maximum AGQ drawdown of -98.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3GDX.L and AGQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	3GDX.L	AGQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-89.13%	-98.16%	+9.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-69.66%	-76.21%	+6.55%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-76.21%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-76.25%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-50.54%	-83.72%	+33.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-60.70%	-79.83%	+19.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	25.00%	28.27%	-3.27%

Volatility

3GDX.L vs. AGQ - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 3x Long Gold Miners ETC (3GDX.L) has a higher volatility of 55.66% compared to ProShares Ultra Silver (AGQ) at 34.37%. This indicates that 3GDX.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AGQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	3GDX.L	AGQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	55.66%	34.37%	+21.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	112.43%	132.42%	-19.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	132.29%	117.90%	+14.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	104.76%	73.01%	+31.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	104.76%	64.67%	+40.09%