PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
3199.HK vs. EMHY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

3199.HK vs. EMHY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a HK$10,000 investment in ICBC CSOP FTSE Chinese Government and Policy Bank Bond Index ETF (3199.HK) and iShares J.P. Morgan EM High Yield Bond ETF (EMHY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

3199.HK is traded in HKD, while EMHY is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the EMHY values have been converted to HKD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3199.HK achieves a 5.60% return, which is significantly higher than EMHY's 4.20% return. Over the past 10 years, 3199.HK has underperformed EMHY with an annualized return of 2.93%, while EMHY has yielded a comparatively higher 4.85% annualized return.


3199.HK

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.12%
YTD
5.60%
6M
5.96%
1Y
6.95%
3Y*
5.89%
5Y*
3.06%
10Y*
2.93%

EMHY

1D
0.00%
1M
1.40%
YTD
4.20%
6M
4.09%
1Y
11.96%
3Y*
12.62%
5Y*
4.62%
10Y*
4.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

3199.HK vs. EMHY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
3199.HK
ICBC CSOP FTSE Chinese Government and Policy Bank Bond Index ETF
5.60%5.50%3.23%2.29%-6.15%7.24%10.68%0.52%0.60%6.18%
EMHY
iShares J.P. Morgan EM High Yield Bond ETF
4.20%13.92%11.39%11.46%-12.88%-1.37%3.36%12.39%-5.01%9.37%

Correlation

The correlation between 3199.HK and EMHY is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2014

0.07

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

3199.HK vs. EMHY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3199.HK
3199.HK Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
3199.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3199.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
3199.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
3199.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
3199.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

EMHY
EMHY Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
EMHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMHY Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
EMHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMHY Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3199.HK vs. EMHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ICBC CSOP FTSE Chinese Government and Policy Bank Bond Index ETF (3199.HK) and iShares J.P. Morgan EM High Yield Bond ETF (EMHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


3199.HKEMHYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.41

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.51

2.89

+1.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.94

12.86

-1.92

3199.HK vs. EMHY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3199.HK Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is comparable to the EMHY Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3199.HK and EMHY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

3199.HK vs. EMHY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3199.HK drawdown since its inception was -13.70%, smaller than the maximum EMHY drawdown of -30.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3199.HK and EMHY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


3199.HKEMHYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.70%

-30.18%

+16.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.60%

-4.16%

+2.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.84%

-6.05%

+2.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.05%

-25.16%

+14.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-13.70%

-30.18%

+16.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.78%

-0.23%

-0.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.39%

-4.75%

+1.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.65%

0.93%

-0.28%

Volatility

3199.HK vs. EMHY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ICBC CSOP FTSE Chinese Government and Policy Bank Bond Index ETF (3199.HK) is 1.35%, while iShares J.P. Morgan EM High Yield Bond ETF (EMHY) has a volatility of 1.51%. This indicates that 3199.HK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMHY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


3199.HKEMHYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.35%

1.51%

-0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.75%

4.46%

-0.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.87%

5.77%

-0.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.39%

9.09%

-3.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.57%

10.61%

-4.04%

3199.HK vs. EMHY - Expense Ratio Comparison

3199.HK has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than EMHY's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

3199.HK vs. EMHY - Dividend Comparison

3199.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.33%, less than EMHY's 6.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
3199.HK
ICBC CSOP FTSE Chinese Government and Policy Bank Bond Index ETF
3.33%3.34%3.42%3.51%3.65%3.40%3.29%3.57%3.61%3.39%3.55%3.68%
EMHY
iShares J.P. Morgan EM High Yield Bond ETF
6.37%6.52%6.86%6.73%7.08%5.58%5.44%5.72%6.79%5.59%6.43%6.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


3199.HK and EMHY have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EMHY is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EMHY is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for 3199.HK.

3199.HK tracks FTSE Chinese Government and Policy Bank Bond, while EMHY tracks J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets High Yield Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: CSOP and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for 3199.HK and 0.50% for EMHY.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 3199.HK and EMHY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer