3199.HK vs. 2807.HK

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

3199.HK (ICBC CSOP FTSE Chinese Government and Policy Bank Bond Index ETF) and 2807.HK (Global X China Robotics and AI ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - 3199.HK is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the FTSE Chinese Government and Policy Bank Bond, while 2807.HK is a Robotics fund tracking the FactSet China Robotics and Artificial Intelligence Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, 3199.HK returned 2.88%/yr vs 0.57%/yr for 2807.HK. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. 3199.HK charges 0.62%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for 2807.HK.

Performance

3199.HK vs. 2807.HK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a HK$10,000 investment in ICBC CSOP FTSE Chinese Government and Policy Bank Bond Index ETF (3199.HK) and Global X China Robotics and AI ETF (2807.HK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3199.HK achieves a 5.99% return, which is significantly lower than 2807.HK's 10.81% return.

3199.HK

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: 1.09%
• YTD: 5.99%
• 6M: 6.91%
• 1Y: 7.82%
• 3Y*: 5.62%
• 5Y*: 2.88%
• 10Y*: 2.92%

2807.HK

• 1D: -0.79%
• 1M: 3.56%
• YTD: 10.81%
• 6M: 15.60%
• 1Y: 38.43%
• 3Y*: 7.71%
• 5Y*: 0.57%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

3199.HK vs. 2807.HK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
3199.HK ICBC CSOP FTSE Chinese Government and Policy Bank Bond Index ETF	5.99%	5.50%	3.24%	2.30%	-6.26%	7.36%	8.99%
2807.HK Global X China Robotics and AI ETF	10.81%	23.46%	5.68%	1.71%	-33.54%	11.35%	5.75%

Correlation

The correlation between 3199.HK and 2807.HK is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.12
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.14
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.21
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 10, 2020	0.22

The correlation between 3199.HK and 2807.HK shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (1 year) to 0.22 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

3199.HK vs. 2807.HK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3199.HK

3199.HK Risk / Return Rank: 64
3199.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
3199.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
3199.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 53
3199.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
3199.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 71

2807.HK

2807.HK Risk / Return Rank: 38
2807.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
2807.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
2807.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 36
2807.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
2807.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3199.HK vs. 2807.HK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ICBC CSOP FTSE Chinese Government and Policy Bank Bond Index ETF (3199.HK) and Global X China Robotics and AI ETF (2807.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	3199.HK	2807.HK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.71	1.42	+0.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.60	1.99	+0.61
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.23	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.39	1.92	+3.48
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.10	4.47	+8.63
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

3199.HK vs. 2807.HK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3199.HK Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is comparable to the 2807.HK Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3199.HK and 2807.HK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	3199.HK	2807.HK	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.71	1.42	+0.29
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.57	0.02	+0.56
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.60	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.56	0.08	+0.49

Drawdowns

3199.HK vs. 2807.HK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3199.HK drawdown since its inception was -11.05%, smaller than the maximum 2807.HK drawdown of -51.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3199.HK and 2807.HK.

Drawdown Indicators

	3199.HK	2807.HK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.05%	-51.88%	+40.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.60%	-21.31%	+19.71%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.84%	-36.43%	+32.59%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-11.05%	-49.29%	+38.24%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-11.05%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.41%	-11.63%	+11.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.26%	-26.87%	+23.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.63%	9.07%	-8.44%

Volatility

3199.HK vs. 2807.HK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ICBC CSOP FTSE Chinese Government and Policy Bank Bond Index ETF (3199.HK) is 1.54%, while Global X China Robotics and AI ETF (2807.HK) has a volatility of 8.55%. This indicates that 3199.HK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 2807.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	3199.HK	2807.HK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.54%	8.55%	-7.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.83%	20.63%	-16.80%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.06%	28.89%	-23.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.74%	32.63%	-26.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.71%	32.73%	-27.02%

3199.HK vs. 2807.HK - Expense Ratio Comparison

3199.HK has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is lower than 2807.HK's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

3199.HK vs. 2807.HK - Dividend Comparison

3199.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.31%, while 2807.HK has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
2807.HK Global X China Robotics and AI ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
3199.HK ICBC CSOP FTSE Chinese Government and Policy Bank Bond Index ETF	3.31%	3.34%	3.43%	3.51%	3.65%	3.40%	3.29%	3.57%	3.62%	3.39%	3.56%	3.69%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both 3199.HK and 2807.HK in my portfolio?

3199.HK and 2807.HK have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, 3199.HK or 2807.HK?

On fees, 3199.HK is cheaper at 0.62% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, 3199.HK or 2807.HK?

3199.HK is cheaper with a 0.62% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for 2807.HK.

What is the main difference between 3199.HK and 2807.HK?

3199.HK is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while 2807.HK is Robotics. 3199.HK tracks FTSE Chinese Government and Policy Bank Bond, while 2807.HK tracks FactSet China Robotics and Artificial Intelligence Index. They also come from different issuers: CSOP and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for 3199.HK and 0.68% for 2807.HK.