PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
2NFL.L vs. 3NIE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

2NFL.L vs. 3NIE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2x Netflix ETC A GBP (2NFL.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long NIO ETP Securities (3NIE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

2NFL.L is traded in GBp, while 3NIE.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the 3NIE.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 2NFL.L achieves a -30.54% return, which is significantly lower than 3NIE.L's -27.67% return.


2NFL.L

1D
-4.96%
1M
-25.11%
YTD
-30.54%
6M
-44.36%
1Y
-63.09%
3Y*
27.79%
5Y*
-6.80%
10Y*

3NIE.L

1D
-13.30%
1M
-12.04%
YTD
-27.67%
6M
-3.16%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

2NFL.L vs. 3NIE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
2NFL.L
Leverage Shares 2x Netflix ETC A GBP
-30.54%-22.84%
3NIE.L
Leverage Shares 3x Long NIO ETP Securities
-27.67%-23.05%

Correlation

The correlation between 2NFL.L and 3NIE.L is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 26, 2025

-0.17

2NFL.L vs. 3NIE.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
2NFL.L
3NIE.L

Communication Services

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

100.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Communication Services

2NFL.L
100.0%
3NIE.L

-

Basic Materials

2NFL.L

-

3NIE.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

2NFL.L

-

3NIE.L
100.0%

Consumer Defensive

2NFL.L

-

3NIE.L

-

Energy

2NFL.L

-

3NIE.L

-

Financial Services

2NFL.L

-

3NIE.L

-

Healthcare

2NFL.L

-

3NIE.L

-

Industrials

2NFL.L

-

3NIE.L

-

Real Estate

2NFL.L

-

3NIE.L

-

Technology

2NFL.L

-

3NIE.L

-

Utilities

2NFL.L

-

3NIE.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

2NFL.L vs. 3NIE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

2NFL.L
2NFL.L Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
2NFL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
2NFL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
2NFL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
2NFL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
2NFL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

3NIE.L
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

2NFL.L vs. 3NIE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2x Netflix ETC A GBP (2NFL.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long NIO ETP Securities (3NIE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


2NFL.L3NIE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.80

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.43

2NFL.L vs. 3NIE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


2NFL.L3NIE.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.98

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.04

-0.39

+0.43

Drawdowns

2NFL.L vs. 3NIE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 2NFL.L drawdown since its inception was -95.91%, which is greater than 3NIE.L's maximum drawdown of -60.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2NFL.L and 3NIE.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


2NFL.L3NIE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.91%

-60.99%

-34.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-71.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-71.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-95.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-68.20%

-48.43%

-19.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-48.90%

-36.78%

-12.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

44.03%

Volatility

2NFL.L vs. 3NIE.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


2NFL.L3NIE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

52.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

64.50%

175.61%

-111.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

91.01%

175.61%

-84.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

85.97%

175.61%

-89.64%

2NFL.L vs. 3NIE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both 2NFL.L and 3NIE.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

2NFL.L vs. 3NIE.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 2NFL.L nor 3NIE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


2NFL.L and 3NIE.L have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

2NFL.L and 3NIE.L have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

2NFL.L tracks NYSE Leveraged 2x NFLX Index, while 3NIE.L tracks iSTOXX Leveraged 3x NIO Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 2NFL.L and 3NIE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer