PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
2NFL.L vs. 2GOO.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

2NFL.L vs. 2GOO.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2x Netflix ETC A GBP (2NFL.L) and Leverage Shares 2x Alphabet ETC A GBP (2GOO.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 2NFL.L achieves a -30.54% return, which is significantly lower than 2GOO.L's 20.10% return.


2NFL.L

1D
-4.96%
1M
-25.11%
YTD
-30.54%
6M
-44.36%
1Y
-63.09%
3Y*
27.79%
5Y*
-6.80%
10Y*

2GOO.L

1D
-4.82%
1M
-13.15%
YTD
20.10%
6M
13.88%
1Y
280.03%
3Y*
65.10%
5Y*
32.44%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

2NFL.L vs. 2GOO.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
2NFL.L
Leverage Shares 2x Netflix ETC A GBP
-30.54%-20.02%192.97%115.23%-87.10%23.08%100.08%-3.01%
2GOO.L
Leverage Shares 2x Alphabet ETC A GBP
20.10%100.64%64.47%106.54%-66.92%166.13%33.93%31.48%

Correlation

The correlation between 2NFL.L and 2GOO.L is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2019

0.31

The correlation between 2NFL.L and 2GOO.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.32 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

2NFL.L vs. 2GOO.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

2NFL.L
2NFL.L Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
2NFL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
2NFL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
2NFL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
2NFL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
2NFL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

2GOO.L
2GOO.L Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
2GOO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
2GOO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
2GOO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
2GOO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
2GOO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

2NFL.L vs. 2GOO.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2x Netflix ETC A GBP (2NFL.L) and Leverage Shares 2x Alphabet ETC A GBP (2GOO.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


2NFL.L2GOO.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-6.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-6.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.80

1.58

-0.78

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.89

7.79

-8.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.43

26.12

-27.55

2NFL.L vs. 2GOO.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 2NFL.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.98, which is lower than the 2GOO.L Sharpe Ratio of 5.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 2NFL.L and 2GOO.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


2NFL.L2GOO.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.98

5.07

-6.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.07

0.56

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.04

0.82

-0.78

Drawdowns

2NFL.L vs. 2GOO.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 2NFL.L drawdown since its inception was -95.91%, which is greater than 2GOO.L's maximum drawdown of -69.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2NFL.L and 2GOO.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


2NFL.L2GOO.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.91%

-69.73%

-26.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-71.00%

-35.69%

-35.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-71.00%

-53.24%

-17.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-95.91%

-69.73%

-26.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-68.20%

-20.94%

-47.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-48.90%

-24.97%

-23.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

44.03%

10.67%

+33.36%

Volatility

2NFL.L vs. 2GOO.L - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 2x Netflix ETC A GBP (2NFL.L) has a higher volatility of 19.52% compared to Leverage Shares 2x Alphabet ETC A GBP (2GOO.L) at 13.58%. This indicates that 2NFL.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 2GOO.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


2NFL.L2GOO.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.52%

13.58%

+5.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

52.17%

34.93%

+17.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

64.50%

54.88%

+9.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

91.01%

59.04%

+31.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

85.97%

61.78%

+24.19%

2NFL.L vs. 2GOO.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both 2NFL.L and 2GOO.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

2NFL.L vs. 2GOO.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 2NFL.L nor 2GOO.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


2NFL.L and 2GOO.L have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

2NFL.L and 2GOO.L have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

2NFL.L tracks NYSE Leveraged 2x NFLX Index, while 2GOO.L tracks NYSE Leveraged 2x GOOG Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 2NFL.L and 2GOO.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer