2MU.L vs. 3XLE.L
2MU.L (Leverage Shares 2x Micron Technology ETC GBP) and 3XLE.L (Leverage Shares 3x Long Oil & Gas ETP Securities GBP) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Leverage Shares. 2MU.L is passively managed, while 3XLE.L is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, 2MU.L returned 298.47%/yr vs 15.13%/yr for 3XLE.L. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.
Performance
2MU.L vs. 3XLE.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 2MU.L achieves a 890.70% return, which is significantly higher than 3XLE.L's 98.06% return.
2MU.L
- 1D
- 3.90%
- 1M
- 267.24%
- YTD
- 890.70%
- 6M
- 1,363.92%
- 1Y
- 6,514.91%
- 3Y*
- 298.47%
- 5Y*
- 99.54%
- 10Y*
- —
3XLE.L
- 1D
- 6.81%
- 1M
- -1.92%
- YTD
- 98.06%
- 6M
- 87.16%
- 1Y
- 122.22%
- 3Y*
- 15.13%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
2MU.L vs. 3XLE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2MU.L Leverage Shares 2x Micron Technology ETC GBP | 890.70% | 550.25% | -30.59% | 142.95% | -76.42% | 24.03% |
3XLE.L Leverage Shares 3x Long Oil & Gas ETP Securities GBP | 98.06% | -17.73% | -12.65% | -29.34% | 191.33% | -3.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between 2MU.L and 3XLE.L is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2021 | 0.12 |
The correlation between 2MU.L and 3XLE.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.12 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
2MU.L vs. 3XLE.L — Risk / Return Rank
2MU.L
3XLE.L
2MU.L vs. 3XLE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2x Micron Technology ETC GBP (2MU.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long Oil & Gas ETP Securities GBP (3XLE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 2MU.L | 3XLE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +48.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +5.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.95 | 1.29 | +0.66 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 120.42 | 3.10 | +117.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 429.29 | 8.55 | +420.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 2MU.L | 3XLE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.34 | 1.82 | +48.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.99 | 0.34 | +0.65 |
Drawdowns
2MU.L vs. 3XLE.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 2MU.L drawdown since its inception was -89.16%, which is greater than 3XLE.L's maximum drawdown of -74.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2MU.L and 3XLE.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 2MU.L | 3XLE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.16% | -74.89% | -14.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.20% | -39.26% | -13.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -89.16% | -66.05% | -23.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -89.16% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -31.69% | +31.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.86% | -45.07% | +0.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.95% | 14.25% | +0.70% |
Volatility
2MU.L vs. 3XLE.L - Volatility Comparison
Leverage Shares 2x Micron Technology ETC GBP (2MU.L) has a higher volatility of 53.51% compared to Leverage Shares 3x Long Oil & Gas ETP Securities GBP (3XLE.L) at 25.62%. This indicates that 2MU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 3XLE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 2MU.L | 3XLE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 53.51% | 25.62% | +27.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 96.13% | 57.75% | +38.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 127.53% | 67.19% | +60.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 104.70% | 82.23% | +22.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 100.80% | 82.23% | +18.57% |
2MU.L vs. 3XLE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both 2MU.L and 3XLE.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.
Dividends
2MU.L vs. 3XLE.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither 2MU.L nor 3XLE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
2MU.L and 3XLE.L have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
2MU.L and 3XLE.L have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.
Find the right allocation for 2MU.L and 3XLE.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer