PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
2MU.L vs. 3AMD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

2MU.L vs. 3AMD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2x Micron Technology ETC GBP (2MU.L) and Leverage Shares 3x AMD ETC GBP (3AMD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

2MU.L vs. 3AMD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
2MU.L
Leverage Shares 2x Micron Technology ETC GBP
8.84%550.25%-30.59%142.95%-76.42%31.82%
3AMD.L
Leverage Shares 3x AMD ETC GBP
-45.05%53.77%-76.38%448.82%-97.41%265.31%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 2MU.L achieves a 8.84% return, which is significantly higher than 3AMD.L's -45.05% return.


2MU.L

1D
-8.95%
1M
-40.76%
YTD
8.84%
6M
192.50%
1Y
740.37%
3Y*
103.49%
5Y*
21.91%
10Y*

3AMD.L

1D
-2.76%
1M
-9.65%
YTD
-45.05%
6M
-13.62%
1Y
89.07%
3Y*
-25.93%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


2MU.L vs. 3AMD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both 2MU.L and 3AMD.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Return for Risk

2MU.L vs. 3AMD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

2MU.L
2MU.L Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
2MU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
2MU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
2MU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
2MU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
2MU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

3AMD.L
3AMD.L Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
3AMD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3AMD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
3AMD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
3AMD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
3AMD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

2MU.L vs. 3AMD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2x Micron Technology ETC GBP (2MU.L) and Leverage Shares 3x AMD ETC GBP (3AMD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


2MU.L3AMD.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

6.20

0.51

+5.69

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.77

1.95

+1.81

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.25

+0.24

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

12.69

1.10

+11.60

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

37.69

2.01

+35.67

2MU.L vs. 3AMD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 2MU.L Sharpe Ratio is 6.20, which is higher than the 3AMD.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 2MU.L and 3AMD.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


2MU.L3AMD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.20

0.51

+5.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

-0.25

+0.65

Correlation

The correlation between 2MU.L and 3AMD.L is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

2MU.L vs. 3AMD.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 2MU.L nor 3AMD.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

2MU.L vs. 3AMD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 2MU.L drawdown since its inception was -89.16%, smaller than the maximum 3AMD.L drawdown of -99.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2MU.L and 3AMD.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


2MU.L3AMD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.16%

-99.50%

+10.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-53.20%

-76.34%

+23.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-89.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-53.20%

-97.92%

+44.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-45.85%

-84.85%

+39.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.92%

41.54%

-23.62%

Volatility

2MU.L vs. 3AMD.L - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 2x Micron Technology ETC GBP (2MU.L) has a higher volatility of 39.85% compared to Leverage Shares 3x AMD ETC GBP (3AMD.L) at 37.47%. This indicates that 2MU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 3AMD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


2MU.L3AMD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

39.85%

37.47%

+2.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

88.75%

140.12%

-51.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

118.58%

174.34%

-55.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

99.47%

153.89%

-54.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

96.85%

153.89%

-57.04%