PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
2MU.L vs. 3GOE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

2MU.L vs. 3GOE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2x Micron Technology ETC GBP (2MU.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Alphabet ETP Scs (3GOE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

2MU.L is traded in GBp, while 3GOE.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the 3GOE.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 2MU.L achieves a 890.70% return, which is significantly higher than 3GOE.L's 24.70% return.


2MU.L

1D
3.90%
1M
267.24%
YTD
890.70%
6M
1,363.92%
1Y
6,514.91%
3Y*
298.47%
5Y*
99.54%
10Y*

3GOE.L

1D
-8.70%
1M
-19.48%
YTD
24.70%
6M
13.89%
1Y
526.53%
3Y*
78.18%
5Y*
27.72%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

2MU.L vs. 3GOE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
2MU.L
Leverage Shares 2x Micron Technology ETC GBP
890.70%550.25%-30.59%142.95%-76.42%45.29%65.67%
3GOE.L
Leverage Shares 3x Alphabet ETP Scs
24.70%117.01%92.46%146.89%-84.96%324.04%29.92%

Correlation

The correlation between 2MU.L and 3GOE.L is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2020

0.36

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

2MU.L vs. 3GOE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

2MU.L
2MU.L Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
2MU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
2MU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
2MU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
2MU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
2MU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

3GOE.L
3GOE.L Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
3GOE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3GOE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
3GOE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
3GOE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
3GOE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

2MU.L vs. 3GOE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2x Micron Technology ETC GBP (2MU.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Alphabet ETP Scs (3GOE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


2MU.L3GOE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+44.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.95

1.55

+0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

120.42

10.59

+109.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

429.29

32.88

+396.41

2MU.L vs. 3GOE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 2MU.L Sharpe Ratio is 50.34, which is higher than the 3GOE.L Sharpe Ratio of 6.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 2MU.L and 3GOE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


2MU.L3GOE.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.34

6.07

+44.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

0.31

+0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.99

0.55

+0.45

Drawdowns

2MU.L vs. 3GOE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 2MU.L drawdown since its inception was -89.16%, roughly equal to the maximum 3GOE.L drawdown of -87.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2MU.L and 3GOE.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


2MU.L3GOE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.16%

-87.19%

-1.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-53.20%

-49.28%

-3.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-89.16%

-70.65%

-18.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-89.16%

-87.19%

-1.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-30.11%

+30.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.86%

-42.11%

-2.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.95%

15.91%

-0.96%

Volatility

2MU.L vs. 3GOE.L - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 2x Micron Technology ETC GBP (2MU.L) has a higher volatility of 53.51% compared to Leverage Shares 3x Alphabet ETP Scs (3GOE.L) at 21.54%. This indicates that 2MU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 3GOE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


2MU.L3GOE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

53.51%

21.54%

+31.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

96.13%

53.08%

+43.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

127.53%

86.05%

+41.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

104.70%

88.88%

+15.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

100.80%

88.50%

+12.30%

2MU.L vs. 3GOE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both 2MU.L and 3GOE.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

2MU.L vs. 3GOE.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 2MU.L nor 3GOE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


2MU.L and 3GOE.L have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

2MU.L and 3GOE.L have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

2MU.L tracks iSTOXX Leveraged 2X MU Index, while 3GOE.L tracks iSTOXX Leveraged 3X GOOG Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 2MU.L and 3GOE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer