2MU.L vs. 2MSF.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Leverage Shares 2x Micron Technology ETC GBP (2MU.L) and Leverage Shares 2x Microsoft ETC A GBP (2MSF.L).
2MU.L and 2MSF.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. 2MU.L is a passively managed fund by Leverage Shares that tracks the performance of the iSTOXX Leveraged 2X MU Index. It was launched on Jun 4, 2020. 2MSF.L is a passively managed fund by Leverage Shares that tracks the performance of the NYSE Leveraged 2x MSFT Index. It was launched on Dec 5, 2017. Both 2MU.L and 2MSF.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
2MU.L vs. 2MSF.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
2MU.L vs. 2MSF.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2MU.L Leverage Shares 2x Micron Technology ETC GBP | 8.84% | 550.25% | -30.59% | 142.95% | -76.42% | 45.29% | 65.67% |
2MSF.L Leverage Shares 2x Microsoft ETC A GBP | -45.63% | 4.50% | 17.75% | 106.56% | -51.52% | 121.86% | 27.54% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 2MU.L achieves a 8.84% return, which is significantly higher than 2MSF.L's -45.63% return.
2MU.L
- 1D
- -8.95%
- 1M
- -40.76%
- YTD
- 8.84%
- 6M
- 192.50%
- 1Y
- 740.37%
- 3Y*
- 103.49%
- 5Y*
- 21.91%
- 10Y*
- —
2MSF.L
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- -13.92%
- YTD
- -45.63%
- 6M
- -52.81%
- 1Y
- -18.49%
- 3Y*
- 1.44%
- 5Y*
- 5.35%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
2MU.L vs. 2MSF.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both 2MU.L and 2MSF.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.
Return for Risk
2MU.L vs. 2MSF.L — Risk / Return Rank
2MU.L
2MSF.L
2MU.L vs. 2MSF.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2x Micron Technology ETC GBP (2MU.L) and Leverage Shares 2x Microsoft ETC A GBP (2MSF.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 2MU.L | 2MSF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 6.20 | -0.28 | +6.47 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.77 | 0.04 | +3.73 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.01 | +0.48 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 12.69 | -0.35 | +13.05 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 37.69 | -0.74 | +38.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 2MU.L | 2MSF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.20 | -0.28 | +6.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 | 0.10 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.48 | -0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between 2MU.L and 2MSF.L is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
2MU.L vs. 2MSF.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither 2MU.L nor 2MSF.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
2MU.L vs. 2MSF.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 2MU.L drawdown since its inception was -89.16%, which is greater than 2MSF.L's maximum drawdown of -66.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2MU.L and 2MSF.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| 2MU.L | 2MSF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.16% | -66.77% | -22.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.20% | -66.77% | +13.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -89.16% | -66.77% | -22.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -53.20% | -65.80% | +12.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.85% | -17.91% | -27.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.92% | 31.66% | -13.74% |
Volatility
2MU.L vs. 2MSF.L - Volatility Comparison
Leverage Shares 2x Micron Technology ETC GBP (2MU.L) has a higher volatility of 39.85% compared to Leverage Shares 2x Microsoft ETC A GBP (2MSF.L) at 9.74%. This indicates that 2MU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 2MSF.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| 2MU.L | 2MSF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 39.85% | 9.74% | +30.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 88.75% | 56.67% | +32.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 118.58% | 67.06% | +51.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 99.47% | 52.29% | +47.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 96.85% | 52.22% | +44.63% |