2MSF.L vs. SUK2.L
2MSF.L (Leverage Shares 2x Microsoft ETC A GBP) and SUK2.L (L&G FTSE 100 Super Short Strategy (Daily 2x) UCITS ETF GBP (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - 2MSF.L is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NYSE Leveraged 2x MSFT Index, while SUK2.L is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the FTSE 100 Daily Super Short Strategy Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, 2MSF.L returned 0.80%/yr vs -17.69%/yr for SUK2.L. At a correlation of -0.32, they often move in opposite directions. 2MSF.L charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for SUK2.L.
Performance
2MSF.L vs. SUK2.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 2MSF.L achieves a -41.74% return, which is significantly lower than SUK2.L's -12.71% return.
2MSF.L
- 1D
- -3.95%
- 1M
- 0.72%
- 6M
- -34.51%
- YTD
- -41.74%
- 1Y
- -50.26%
- 3Y*
- -5.82%
- 5Y*
- 0.80%
- 10Y*
- —
SUK2.L
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- -1.24%
- 6M
- -7.72%
- YTD
- -12.71%
- 1Y
- -27.94%
- 3Y*
- -19.62%
- 5Y*
- -17.69%
- 10Y*
- -17.07%
2MSF.L vs. SUK2.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2MSF.L Leverage Shares 2x Microsoft ETC A GBP | -41.74% | 4.50% | 17.75% | 106.56% | -51.52% | 121.86% | 56.71% | 122.13% | 0.93% | 0.50% |
SUK2.L L&G FTSE 100 Super Short Strategy (Daily 2x) UCITS ETF GBP (Acc) | -12.71% | -32.13% | -6.81% | -6.41% | -13.97% | -32.73% | -1.17% | -29.96% | 15.40% | -10.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between 2MSF.L and SUK2.L is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2017 | -0.32 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between 2MSF.L and SUK2.L has weakened: their correlation has moved from -0.32 to -0.08, meaning they move in opposite directions less often than they have historically.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
2MSF.L vs. SUK2.L — Risk / Return Rank
2MSF.L
SUK2.L
2MSF.L vs. SUK2.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2x Microsoft ETC A GBP (2MSF.L) and L&G FTSE 100 Super Short Strategy (Daily 2x) UCITS ETF GBP (Acc) (SUK2.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| 2MSF.L | SUK2.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | 0.80 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.81 | -0.91 | +0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.35 | -1.45 | +0.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
2MSF.L vs. SUK2.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 2MSF.L drawdown since its inception was -61.61%, smaller than the maximum SUK2.L drawdown of -98.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2MSF.L and SUK2.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 2MSF.L | SUK2.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.61% | -98.38% | +36.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -61.61% | -30.53% | -31.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -61.61% | -52.62% | -8.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.61% | -65.37% | +3.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -86.18% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -55.13% | -98.31% | +43.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.16% | -84.98% | +65.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 37.31% | 18.90% | +18.41% |
Volatility
2MSF.L vs. SUK2.L - Volatility Comparison
Leverage Shares 2x Microsoft ETC A GBP (2MSF.L) has a higher volatility of 19.68% compared to L&G FTSE 100 Super Short Strategy (Daily 2x) UCITS ETF GBP (Acc) (SUK2.L) at 5.69%. This indicates that 2MSF.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SUK2.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 2MSF.L | SUK2.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.68% | 5.69% | +13.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 51.89% | 19.48% | +32.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.05% | 22.53% | +34.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.18% | 25.52% | +25.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.73% | 29.98% | +21.75% |
2MSF.L vs. SUK2.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
2MSF.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SUK2.L's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
2MSF.L vs. SUK2.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither 2MSF.L nor SUK2.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
2MSF.L and SUK2.L have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SUK2.L is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SUK2.L is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 2MSF.L.
2MSF.L is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while SUK2.L is Inverse Equities. 2MSF.L tracks NYSE Leveraged 2x MSFT Index, while SUK2.L tracks FTSE 100 Daily Super Short Strategy Index. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and L&G. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for 2MSF.L and 0.60% for SUK2.L.
Find the right allocation for 2MSF.L and SUK2.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer