2MSF.L vs. NVDI.L
2MSF.L (Leverage Shares 2x Microsoft ETC A GBP) and NVDI.L (IncomeShares NVIDIA NVDA Options ETP) are both exchange-traded funds - 2MSF.L is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NYSE Leveraged 2x MSFT Index, while NVDI.L is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Leverage Shares. 2MSF.L is passively managed, while NVDI.L is actively managed. Over the past year, 2MSF.L returned -25.08% vs 21.15% for NVDI.L. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. 2MSF.L charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for NVDI.L.
Performance
2MSF.L vs. NVDI.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
2MSF.L is traded in GBp, while NVDI.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the NVDI.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 2MSF.L achieves a -27.61% return, which is significantly lower than NVDI.L's -0.03% return.
2MSF.L
- 1D
- 2.03%
- 1M
- 9.24%
- YTD
- -27.61%
- 6M
- -26.03%
- 1Y
- -25.08%
- 3Y*
- 0.32%
- 5Y*
- 10.56%
- 10Y*
- —
NVDI.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 9.34%
- YTD
- -0.03%
- 6M
- 1.31%
- 1Y
- 21.15%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
2MSF.L vs. NVDI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
2MSF.L Leverage Shares 2x Microsoft ETC A GBP | -27.61% | 4.50% | -11.05% |
NVDI.L IncomeShares NVIDIA NVDA Options ETP | -0.03% | 8.34% | -4.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between 2MSF.L and NVDI.L is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2024 | 0.42 |
The correlation between 2MSF.L and NVDI.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (1 year) to 0.42 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
2MSF.L vs. NVDI.L — Risk / Return Rank
2MSF.L
NVDI.L
2MSF.L vs. NVDI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2x Microsoft ETC A GBP (2MSF.L) and IncomeShares NVIDIA NVDA Options ETP (NVDI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 2MSF.L | NVDI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.13 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.37 | 0.96 | -1.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.63 | 1.84 | -2.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 2MSF.L | NVDI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.38 | 0.64 | -1.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.05 | +0.50 |
Drawdowns
2MSF.L vs. NVDI.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 2MSF.L drawdown since its inception was -66.77%, which is greater than NVDI.L's maximum drawdown of -33.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2MSF.L and NVDI.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 2MSF.L | NVDI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.77% | -33.89% | -32.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -66.77% | -22.04% | -44.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -66.77% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.77% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -54.46% | -11.72% | -42.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.72% | -11.82% | -6.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 39.60% | 11.47% | +28.13% |
Volatility
2MSF.L vs. NVDI.L - Volatility Comparison
Leverage Shares 2x Microsoft ETC A GBP (2MSF.L) has a higher volatility of 20.94% compared to IncomeShares NVIDIA NVDA Options ETP (NVDI.L) at 9.96%. This indicates that 2MSF.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVDI.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 2MSF.L | NVDI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.94% | 9.96% | +10.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 48.79% | 20.22% | +28.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 66.44% | 33.01% | +33.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 53.38% | 39.69% | +13.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 52.69% | 39.69% | +13.00% |
2MSF.L vs. NVDI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
2MSF.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than NVDI.L's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
2MSF.L vs. NVDI.L - Dividend Comparison
2MSF.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.63%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
2MSF.L Leverage Shares 2x Microsoft ETC A GBP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NVDI.L IncomeShares NVIDIA NVDA Options ETP | 20.63% | 32.04% | 2.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
2MSF.L and NVDI.L have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NVDI.L is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NVDI.L is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 2MSF.L.
2MSF.L is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while NVDI.L is Options Trading. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for 2MSF.L and 0.55% for NVDI.L.
Find the right allocation for 2MSF.L and NVDI.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer