2807.HK vs. GLCC.TO

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

2807.HK (Global X China Robotics and AI ETF) and GLCC.TO (Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - 2807.HK is a Robotics fund tracking the FactSet China Robotics and Artificial Intelligence Index, while GLCC.TO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Global X. 2807.HK is passively managed, while GLCC.TO is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, 2807.HK returned 0.57%/yr vs 18.67%/yr for GLCC.TO. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. 2807.HK charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for GLCC.TO.

Performance

2807.HK vs. GLCC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a HK$10,000 investment in Global X China Robotics and AI ETF (2807.HK) and Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF (GLCC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

2807.HK is traded in HKD, while GLCC.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the GLCC.TO values have been converted to HKD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 2807.HK achieves a 10.81% return, which is significantly higher than GLCC.TO's 1.00% return.

2807.HK

• 1D: -0.79%
• 1M: 3.56%
• YTD: 10.81%
• 6M: 15.60%
• 1Y: 38.43%
• 3Y*: 7.71%
• 5Y*: 0.57%
• 10Y*: —

GLCC.TO

• 1D: 1.98%
• 1M: 1.47%
• YTD: 1.00%
• 6M: 7.43%
• 1Y: 60.70%
• 3Y*: 40.24%
• 5Y*: 18.67%
• 10Y*: 13.93%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

2807.HK vs. GLCC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
2807.HK Global X China Robotics and AI ETF	10.81%	23.46%	5.68%	1.71%	-33.54%	11.35%	5.75%
GLCC.TO Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF	1.01%	149.29%	10.12%	8.59%	-8.21%	-8.21%	-12.50%

Correlation

The correlation between 2807.HK and GLCC.TO is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.07
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.08
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.10
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 10, 2020	0.09

Return for Risk

2807.HK vs. GLCC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

2807.HK

2807.HK Risk / Return Rank: 38
2807.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
2807.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
2807.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 36
2807.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
2807.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 31

GLCC.TO

GLCC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 42
GLCC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
GLCC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
GLCC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 44
GLCC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
GLCC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

2807.HK vs. GLCC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X China Robotics and AI ETF (2807.HK) and Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF (GLCC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	2807.HK	GLCC.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.42	1.42	0.00
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.99	1.82	+0.17
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.26	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.92	2.09	-0.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.47	5.57	-1.10
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

2807.HK vs. GLCC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 2807.HK Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is comparable to the GLCC.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 2807.HK and GLCC.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	2807.HK	GLCC.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.42	1.42	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.02	0.55	-0.53
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.41	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.08	0.00	+0.08

Drawdowns

2807.HK vs. GLCC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 2807.HK drawdown since its inception was -51.88%, smaller than the maximum GLCC.TO drawdown of -78.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2807.HK and GLCC.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	2807.HK	GLCC.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.88%	-78.61%	+26.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.31%	-29.18%	+7.87%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-36.43%	-29.18%	-7.25%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-49.29%	-42.35%	-6.94%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-45.72%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.63%	-23.16%	+11.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-26.87%	-45.68%	+18.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.07%	10.93%	-1.86%

Volatility

2807.HK vs. GLCC.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X China Robotics and AI ETF (2807.HK) is 8.55%, while Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF (GLCC.TO) has a volatility of 15.41%. This indicates that 2807.HK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLCC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	2807.HK	GLCC.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.55%	15.41%	-6.86%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.63%	35.38%	-14.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.89%	43.05%	-14.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.63%	34.44%	-1.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.73%	34.07%	-1.34%

2807.HK vs. GLCC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

2807.HK has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than GLCC.TO's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

2807.HK vs. GLCC.TO - Dividend Comparison

2807.HK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GLCC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.51%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
2807.HK Global X China Robotics and AI ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GLCC.TO Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF	8.51%	6.01%	10.30%	11.16%	10.08%	6.31%	6.47%	4.58%	5.62%	7.09%	9.21%	11.63%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both 2807.HK and GLCC.TO in my portfolio?

2807.HK and GLCC.TO have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, 2807.HK or GLCC.TO?

On fees, 2807.HK is cheaper at 0.68% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, 2807.HK or GLCC.TO?

2807.HK is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for GLCC.TO.

What is the main difference between 2807.HK and GLCC.TO?

2807.HK is categorized as Robotics, while GLCC.TO is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for 2807.HK and 0.79% for GLCC.TO.