PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
2328.HK vs. BIAHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

2328.HK vs. BIAHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a HK$10,000 investment in PICC Property & Casualty-H (2328.HK) and Brown Advisory - WMC Strategic European Equity Fund (BIAHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

2328.HK is traded in HKD, while BIAHX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BIAHX values have been converted to HKD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 2328.HK achieves a -9.35% return, which is significantly lower than BIAHX's 0.35% return. Over the past 10 years, 2328.HK has outperformed BIAHX with an annualized return of 14.87%, while BIAHX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.06% annualized return.


2328.HK

1D
0.88%
1M
-0.34%
YTD
-9.35%
6M
-12.61%
1Y
2.56%
3Y*
22.13%
5Y*
21.63%
10Y*
14.87%

BIAHX

1D
-0.13%
1M
-1.39%
YTD
0.35%
6M
3.16%
1Y
8.32%
3Y*
20.91%
5Y*
11.86%
10Y*
12.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

2328.HK vs. BIAHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
2328.HK
PICC Property & Casualty-H
-9.35%38.62%42.41%32.72%23.44%15.71%-32.88%21.68%23.90%29.46%
BIAHX
Brown Advisory - WMC Strategic European Equity Fund
0.35%47.55%10.27%19.34%-11.80%15.16%10.84%28.75%-16.42%33.38%

Correlation

The correlation between 2328.HK and BIAHX is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2013

0.19

The correlation between 2328.HK and BIAHX shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

2328.HK vs. BIAHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

2328.HK
2328.HK Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
2328.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
2328.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
2328.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
2328.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
2328.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

BIAHX
BIAHX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
BIAHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIAHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIAHX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
BIAHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIAHX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

2328.HK vs. BIAHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PICC Property & Casualty-H (2328.HK) and Brown Advisory - WMC Strategic European Equity Fund (BIAHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


2328.HKBIAHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.13

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.10

0.71

-0.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.18

2.16

-1.98

2328.HK vs. BIAHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 2328.HK Sharpe Ratio is 0.09, which is lower than the BIAHX Sharpe Ratio of 0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 2328.HK and BIAHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


2328.HKBIAHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

0.66

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

0.73

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

0.70

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.58

-0.14

Drawdowns

2328.HK vs. BIAHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 2328.HK drawdown since its inception was -89.31%, which is greater than BIAHX's maximum drawdown of -35.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2328.HK and BIAHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


2328.HKBIAHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.31%

-35.00%

-54.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.54%

-12.98%

-14.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.54%

-12.98%

-14.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.54%

-30.25%

+2.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.62%

-35.00%

-9.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.08%

-7.76%

-15.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.64%

-5.89%

-18.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.09%

4.27%

+9.82%

Volatility

2328.HK vs. BIAHX - Volatility Comparison

PICC Property & Casualty-H (2328.HK) has a higher volatility of 7.09% compared to Brown Advisory - WMC Strategic European Equity Fund (BIAHX) at 4.04%. This indicates that 2328.HK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIAHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


2328.HKBIAHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.09%

4.04%

+3.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.05%

11.72%

+8.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.88%

14.06%

+13.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.23%

16.34%

+13.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.67%

17.24%

+16.43%

Dividends

2328.HK vs. BIAHX - Dividend Comparison

2328.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.23%, less than BIAHX's 7.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
2328.HK
PICC Property & Casualty-H
4.23%3.83%6.22%5.65%6.41%7.13%8.59%3.29%3.43%3.54%4.46%3.33%
BIAHX
Brown Advisory - WMC Strategic European Equity Fund
7.63%7.60%5.16%1.13%2.66%9.72%6.39%9.78%12.12%0.83%1.19%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


2328.HK and BIAHX have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 2328.HK and BIAHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer