MMA.AX vs. 3199.HK

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MMA.AX (Maronan Metals Limited) is a stock, while 3199.HK (ICBC CSOP FTSE Chinese Government and Policy Bank Bond Index ETF) is Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the FTSE Chinese Government and Policy Bank Bond. Over the past 3 years, MMA.AX returned 19.25%/yr vs 2.80%/yr for 3199.HK. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions.

Performance

MMA.AX vs. 3199.HK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in Maronan Metals Limited (MMA.AX) and ICBC CSOP FTSE Chinese Government and Policy Bank Bond Index ETF (3199.HK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

MMA.AX is traded in AUD, while 3199.HK is traded in HKD. To make them comparable, the 3199.HK values have been converted to AUD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MMA.AX achieves a -7.14% return, which is significantly lower than 3199.HK's -1.27% return.

MMA.AX

• 1D: -1.27%
• 1M: 25.81%
• YTD: -7.14%
• 6M: 9.86%
• 1Y: 69.57%
• 3Y*: 19.25%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

3199.HK

• 1D: 0.23%
• 1M: 2.00%
• YTD: -1.27%
• 6M: -1.55%
• 1Y: -1.95%
• 3Y*: 2.80%
• 5Y*: 4.43%
• 10Y*: 3.22%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MMA.AX vs. 3199.HK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
MMA.AX Maronan Metals Limited	-7.14%	100.00%	-20.75%	-5.36%	-16.42%
3199.HK ICBC CSOP FTSE Chinese Government and Policy Bank Bond Index ETF	-1.27%	-1.85%	13.65%	2.39%	-0.02%

Correlation

The correlation between MMA.AX and 3199.HK is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.06
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2022	-0.05

Return for Risk

MMA.AX vs. 3199.HK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MMA.AX

MMA.AX Risk / Return Rank: 66
MMA.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
MMA.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
MMA.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 64
MMA.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
MMA.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 63

3199.HK

3199.HK Risk / Return Rank: 64
3199.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
3199.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
3199.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 54
3199.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
3199.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MMA.AX vs. 3199.HK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Maronan Metals Limited (MMA.AX) and ICBC CSOP FTSE Chinese Government and Policy Bank Bond Index ETF (3199.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MMA.AX	3199.HK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.77	-0.22	+1.00
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.65	-0.25	+1.90
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	0.97	+0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.24	-0.31	+1.55
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.39	-0.62	+3.01
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MMA.AX vs. 3199.HK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MMA.AX Sharpe Ratio is 0.77, which is higher than the 3199.HK Sharpe Ratio of -0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MMA.AX and 3199.HK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MMA.AX	3199.HK	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.77	-0.22	+1.00
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.43	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.33	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.05	0.47	-0.42

Drawdowns

MMA.AX vs. 3199.HK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MMA.AX drawdown since its inception was -55.64%, which is greater than 3199.HK's maximum drawdown of -20.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMA.AX and 3199.HK.

Drawdown Indicators

	MMA.AX	3199.HK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.64%	-20.41%	-35.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-55.64%	-6.89%	-48.75%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-55.64%	-10.59%	-45.05%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-10.59%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-20.41%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-41.35%	-7.41%	-33.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-33.77%	-6.37%	-27.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	28.93%	3.31%	+25.62%

Volatility

MMA.AX vs. 3199.HK - Volatility Comparison

Maronan Metals Limited (MMA.AX) has a higher volatility of 22.86% compared to ICBC CSOP FTSE Chinese Government and Policy Bank Bond Index ETF (3199.HK) at 2.76%. This indicates that MMA.AX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 3199.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MMA.AX	3199.HK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	22.86%	2.76%	+20.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	70.74%	7.48%	+63.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	88.96%	9.74%	+79.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	75.72%	11.67%	+64.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	75.72%	11.24%	+64.48%

Dividends

MMA.AX vs. 3199.HK - Dividend Comparison

MMA.AX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while 3199.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.31%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
3199.HK ICBC CSOP FTSE Chinese Government and Policy Bank Bond Index ETF	3.31%	3.34%	3.43%	3.51%	3.65%	3.40%	3.29%	3.57%	3.62%	3.39%	3.56%	3.69%
MMA.AX Maronan Metals Limited	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MMA.AX and 3199.HK in my portfolio?

MMA.AX and 3199.HK have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.