1816.HK vs. BITO
1816.HK (CGN Power) is a stock, while BITO (ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF) is Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by ProShares. Over the past 3 years, 1816.HK returned 19.17%/yr vs 21.69%/yr for BITO. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
1816.HK vs. BITO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
1816.HK is traded in HKD, while BITO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BITO values have been converted to HKD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 1816.HK achieves a 1.35% return, which is significantly higher than BITO's -26.40% return.
1816.HK
- 1D
- 5.49%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- 6M
- -5.13%
- YTD
- 1.35%
- 1Y
- 4.19%
- 3Y*
- 19.17%
- 5Y*
- 16.01%
- 10Y*
- 6.71%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.16%
BITO
- 1D
- 1.51%
- 1M
- 3.22%
- 6M
- -32.63%
- YTD
- -26.40%
- 1Y
- -46.70%
- 3Y*
- 21.69%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -4.34%
1816.HK vs. BITO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1816.HK CGN Power | 1.35% | 7.04% | 44.53% | 15.25% | -17.57% | 8.72% |
BITO ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF | -26.40% | -11.02% | 103.39% | 137.30% | -63.85% | -29.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between 1816.HK and BITO is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2021 | 0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
1816.HK vs. BITO — Risk / Return Rank
1816.HK
BITO
1816.HK vs. BITO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CGN Power (1816.HK) and ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| 1816.HK | BITO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 0.82 | +0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.16 | -0.87 | +1.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.42 | -1.37 | +1.80 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
1816.HK vs. BITO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 1816.HK drawdown since its inception was -68.29%, smaller than the maximum BITO drawdown of -77.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 1816.HK and BITO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 1816.HK | BITO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.29% | -77.83% | +9.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.94% | -54.12% | +27.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.46% | -54.12% | +18.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.46% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.46% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.60% | -49.23% | +28.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.62% | -36.95% | -9.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.05% | 34.02% | -23.97% |
Volatility
1816.HK vs. BITO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CGN Power (1816.HK) is 7.99%, while ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO) has a volatility of 10.31%. This indicates that 1816.HK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 1816.HK | BITO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.99% | 10.31% | -2.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.16% | 34.27% | -14.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.51% | 44.20% | -17.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.36% | 54.79% | -24.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.53% | 54.79% | -28.26% |
Dividends
1816.HK vs. BITO - Dividend Comparison
1816.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.42%, less than BITO's 59.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1816.HK CGN Power | 3.42% | 3.52% | 3.62% | 4.74% | 5.31% | 4.08% | 4.97% | 4.05% | 4.48% | 2.73% | 2.34% | 0.11% |
BITO ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF | 59.56% | 78.29% | 61.59% | 15.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
1816.HK and BITO have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for 1816.HK and BITO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer