1810.HK vs. EMIM.L

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

1810.HK (Xiaomi Corp) is a stock, while EMIM.L (iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc)) is Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI EM NR USD. Over the past 5 years, 1810.HK returned -1.43%/yr vs 7.64%/yr for EMIM.L. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

1810.HK vs. EMIM.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a HK$10,000 investment in Xiaomi Corp (1810.HK) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (EMIM.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

1810.HK is traded in HKD, while EMIM.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the EMIM.L values have been converted to HKD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 1810.HK achieves a -33.33% return, which is significantly lower than EMIM.L's 23.08% return.

1810.HK

• 1D: 1.39%
• 1M: -17.61%
• YTD: -33.33%
• 6M: -39.01%
• 1Y: -49.81%
• 3Y*: 33.79%
• 5Y*: -1.43%
• 10Y*: —

EMIM.L

• 1D: 2.66%
• 1M: 1.00%
• YTD: 23.08%
• 6M: 26.47%
• 1Y: 44.88%
• 3Y*: 21.51%
• 5Y*: 7.64%
• 10Y*: 10.67%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

1810.HK vs. EMIM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
1810.HK Xiaomi Corp	-33.33%	13.91%	121.15%	42.60%	-42.12%	-42.81%	206.59%	-16.56%	-22.17%
EMIM.L iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc)	23.08%	32.91%	6.80%	10.45%	-19.64%	0.37%	17.90%	16.59%	-8.09%

Correlation

The correlation between 1810.HK and EMIM.L is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.25
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.32
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.39
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2018	0.37

The correlation between 1810.HK and EMIM.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (1 year) to 0.39 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

1810.HK vs. EMIM.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

1810.HK

1810.HK Risk / Return Rank: 4
1810.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
1810.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
1810.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 3
1810.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
1810.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 6

EMIM.L

EMIM.L Risk / Return Rank: 86
EMIM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
EMIM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
EMIM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 89
EMIM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
EMIM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

1810.HK vs. EMIM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xiaomi Corp (1810.HK) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (EMIM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	1810.HK	EMIM.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.43	2.18	-3.61
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-2.36	2.90	-5.27
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.74	1.40	-0.66
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.89	3.29	-4.18
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.51	11.69	-13.20

1810.HK vs. EMIM.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 1810.HK Sharpe Ratio is -1.43, which is lower than the EMIM.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 1810.HK and EMIM.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

1810.HK vs. EMIM.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 1810.HK drawdown since its inception was -76.06%, which is greater than EMIM.L's maximum drawdown of -39.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 1810.HK and EMIM.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	1810.HK	EMIM.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-76.06%	-39.77%	-36.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-57.04%	-12.79%	-44.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-57.04%	-17.34%	-39.70%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-70.66%	-34.73%	-35.93%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-39.77%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-56.44%	-4.02%	-52.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-42.06%	-13.77%	-28.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	33.21%	3.61%	+29.60%

Volatility

1810.HK vs. EMIM.L - Volatility Comparison

Xiaomi Corp (1810.HK) has a higher volatility of 9.01% compared to iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (EMIM.L) at 8.12%. This indicates that 1810.HK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMIM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	1810.HK	EMIM.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.01%	8.12%	+0.89%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.27%	16.81%	+9.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	35.47%	19.36%	+16.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	44.12%	18.33%	+25.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	45.76%	19.20%	+26.56%

Dividends

1810.HK vs. EMIM.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 1810.HK nor EMIM.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both 1810.HK and EMIM.L in my portfolio?

1810.HK and EMIM.L have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.