PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
1398.HK vs. 1288.HK
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

1398.HK vs. 1288.HK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a HK$10,000 investment in Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (1398.HK) and Agricultural Bank Of China (1288.HK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

1398.HK vs. 1288.HK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
1398.HK
Industrial and Commercial Bank of China
10.65%31.06%47.16%3.30%-1.37%-6.20%-11.59%12.71%-6.42%42.50%
1288.HK
Agricultural Bank Of China
-1.73%40.81%57.87%22.69%9.04%2.09%-11.87%6.07%-0.97%20.81%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 1398.HK achieves a 10.65% return, which is significantly higher than 1288.HK's -1.73% return. Over the past 10 years, 1398.HK has underperformed 1288.HK with an annualized return of 12.28%, while 1288.HK has yielded a comparatively higher 15.03% annualized return.


1398.HK

1D
1.16%
1M
7.91%
YTD
10.65%
6M
24.53%
1Y
32.82%
3Y*
29.19%
5Y*
12.94%
10Y*
12.28%

1288.HK

1D
1.79%
1M
8.40%
YTD
-1.73%
6M
11.96%
1Y
26.44%
3Y*
35.30%
5Y*
22.03%
10Y*
15.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

1398.HK vs. 1288.HK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

1398.HK
1398.HK Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
1398.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
1398.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
1398.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
1398.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
1398.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

1288.HK
1288.HK Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
1288.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
1288.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
1288.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
1288.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
1288.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

1398.HK vs. 1288.HK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (1398.HK) and Agricultural Bank Of China (1288.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


1398.HK1288.HKDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.67

1.13

+0.54

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.17

1.57

+0.60

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.20

+0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.94

1.12

+1.82

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.51

2.39

+5.12

1398.HK vs. 1288.HK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 1398.HK Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is higher than the 1288.HK Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 1398.HK and 1288.HK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


1398.HK1288.HKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.67

1.13

+0.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

1.06

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

0.71

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.41

-0.09

Correlation

The correlation between 1398.HK and 1288.HK is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

1398.HK vs. 1288.HK - Dividend Comparison

1398.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.83%, more than 1288.HK's 4.74% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
1398.HK
Industrial and Commercial Bank of China
4.83%7.81%6.43%8.62%8.54%7.27%5.74%4.75%5.19%4.25%5.92%6.92%
1288.HK
Agricultural Bank Of China
4.74%6.84%5.72%8.01%9.03%8.37%7.04%5.77%6.42%5.35%6.13%7.28%

Drawdowns

1398.HK vs. 1288.HK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 1398.HK drawdown since its inception was -61.33%, which is greater than 1288.HK's maximum drawdown of -51.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 1398.HK and 1288.HK.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


1398.HK1288.HKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.33%

-51.04%

-10.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.69%

-17.35%

+6.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.70%

-22.31%

-7.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.50%

-41.68%

+3.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-8.49%

+8.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.24%

-17.69%

-0.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.18%

8.10%

-3.92%

Volatility

1398.HK vs. 1288.HK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (1398.HK) is 6.10%, while Agricultural Bank Of China (1288.HK) has a volatility of 6.68%. This indicates that 1398.HK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 1288.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


1398.HK1288.HKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.10%

6.68%

-0.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.29%

15.76%

-2.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.18%

24.06%

-3.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.48%

21.49%

-1.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.58%

21.82%

-0.24%

Financials

1398.HK vs. 1288.HK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Industrial and Commercial Bank of China and Agricultural Bank Of China. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in HKD except per share items