1398.HK vs. 1288.HK
Compare and contrast key facts about Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (1398.HK) and Agricultural Bank Of China (1288.HK).
Performance
1398.HK vs. 1288.HK - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
1398.HK vs. 1288.HK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1398.HK Industrial and Commercial Bank of China | 10.65% | 31.06% | 47.16% | 3.30% | -1.37% | -6.20% | -11.59% | 12.71% | -6.42% | 42.50% |
1288.HK Agricultural Bank Of China | -1.73% | 40.81% | 57.87% | 22.69% | 9.04% | 2.09% | -11.87% | 6.07% | -0.97% | 20.81% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 1398.HK achieves a 10.65% return, which is significantly higher than 1288.HK's -1.73% return. Over the past 10 years, 1398.HK has underperformed 1288.HK with an annualized return of 12.28%, while 1288.HK has yielded a comparatively higher 15.03% annualized return.
1398.HK
- 1D
- 1.16%
- 1M
- 7.91%
- YTD
- 10.65%
- 6M
- 24.53%
- 1Y
- 32.82%
- 3Y*
- 29.19%
- 5Y*
- 12.94%
- 10Y*
- 12.28%
1288.HK
- 1D
- 1.79%
- 1M
- 8.40%
- YTD
- -1.73%
- 6M
- 11.96%
- 1Y
- 26.44%
- 3Y*
- 35.30%
- 5Y*
- 22.03%
- 10Y*
- 15.03%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
1398.HK vs. 1288.HK — Risk / Return Rank
1398.HK
1288.HK
1398.HK vs. 1288.HK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (1398.HK) and Agricultural Bank Of China (1288.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 1398.HK | 1288.HK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.67 | 1.13 | +0.54 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.17 | 1.57 | +0.60 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.20 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.94 | 1.12 | +1.82 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.51 | 2.39 | +5.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 1398.HK | 1288.HK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.67 | 1.13 | +0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | 1.06 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | 0.71 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.41 | -0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between 1398.HK and 1288.HK is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
1398.HK vs. 1288.HK - Dividend Comparison
1398.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.83%, more than 1288.HK's 4.74% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1398.HK Industrial and Commercial Bank of China | 4.83% | 7.81% | 6.43% | 8.62% | 8.54% | 7.27% | 5.74% | 4.75% | 5.19% | 4.25% | 5.92% | 6.92% |
1288.HK Agricultural Bank Of China | 4.74% | 6.84% | 5.72% | 8.01% | 9.03% | 8.37% | 7.04% | 5.77% | 6.42% | 5.35% | 6.13% | 7.28% |
Drawdowns
1398.HK vs. 1288.HK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 1398.HK drawdown since its inception was -61.33%, which is greater than 1288.HK's maximum drawdown of -51.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 1398.HK and 1288.HK.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| 1398.HK | 1288.HK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.33% | -51.04% | -10.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.69% | -17.35% | +6.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.70% | -22.31% | -7.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.50% | -41.68% | +3.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -8.49% | +8.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.24% | -17.69% | -0.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.18% | 8.10% | -3.92% |
Volatility
1398.HK vs. 1288.HK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (1398.HK) is 6.10%, while Agricultural Bank Of China (1288.HK) has a volatility of 6.68%. This indicates that 1398.HK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 1288.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| 1398.HK | 1288.HK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.10% | 6.68% | -0.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.29% | 15.76% | -2.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.18% | 24.06% | -3.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.48% | 21.49% | -1.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.58% | 21.82% | -0.24% |
Financials
1398.HK vs. 1288.HK - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Industrial and Commercial Bank of China and Agricultural Bank Of China. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities