PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
1398.HK vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

1398.HK vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a HK$10,000 investment in Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (1398.HK) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

1398.HK is traded in HKD, while ^GSPC is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ^GSPC values have been converted to HKD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with 1398.HK having a 8.40% return and ^GSPC slightly lower at 8.27%. Over the past 10 years, 1398.HK has underperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of 11.56%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively higher 14.02% annualized return.


1398.HK

1D
-2.07%
1M
-2.21%
YTD
8.40%
6M
11.23%
1Y
11.56%
3Y*
28.31%
5Y*
14.80%
10Y*
11.56%

^GSPC

1D
-0.01%
1M
-2.10%
YTD
8.27%
6M
7.01%
1Y
20.62%
3Y*
19.39%
5Y*
11.67%
10Y*
14.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

1398.HK vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
1398.HK
Industrial and Commercial Bank of China
8.40%31.32%46.88%3.30%-1.37%-6.57%-11.24%12.71%-6.42%42.50%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
8.27%16.61%22.67%24.22%-19.31%27.58%15.74%28.20%-6.03%20.34%

Correlation

The correlation between 1398.HK and ^GSPC is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2007

0.13

The correlation between 1398.HK and ^GSPC shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.13 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

1398.HK vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

1398.HK
1398.HK Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
1398.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
1398.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
1398.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
1398.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
1398.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

1398.HK vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (1398.HK) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


1398.HK^GSPCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.30

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.11

2.36

-1.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.86

10.40

-7.55

1398.HK vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 1398.HK Sharpe Ratio is 0.62, which is lower than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 1398.HK and ^GSPC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

1398.HK vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 1398.HK drawdown since its inception was -61.39%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -56.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 1398.HK and ^GSPC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


1398.HK^GSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.39%

-56.80%

-4.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.69%

-8.77%

-1.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.02%

-18.97%

+4.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.77%

-24.92%

-0.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.50%

-34.06%

-4.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.17%

-3.28%

-4.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.20%

-9.26%

-8.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.11%

1.99%

+2.12%

Volatility

1398.HK vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (1398.HK) has a higher volatility of 7.60% compared to S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) at 4.82%. This indicates that 1398.HK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


1398.HK^GSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.60%

4.82%

+2.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.51%

9.88%

+4.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.20%

12.49%

+6.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.69%

16.99%

+3.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.55%

18.05%

+3.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


1398.HK and ^GSPC have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 1398.HK and ^GSPC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer