PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
1398.HK vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

1398.HK vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a HK$10,000 investment in Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (1398.HK) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

1398.HK is traded in HKD, while ^GSPC is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ^GSPC values have been converted to HKD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 1398.HK achieves a 9.86% return, which is significantly higher than ^GSPC's 8.56% return.


1398.HK

1D
0.00%
1M
-3.31%
YTD
9.86%
6M
9.17%
1Y
23.60%
3Y*
27.25%
5Y*
15.02%
10Y*
12.31%

^GSPC

1D
-2.65%
1M
0.23%
YTD
8.56%
6M
8.16%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

1398.HK vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
1398.HK
Industrial and Commercial Bank of China
9.86%12.89%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
8.56%13.17%

Correlation

The correlation between 1398.HK and ^GSPC is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2025

-0.06

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

1398.HK vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

1398.HK
1398.HK Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
1398.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
1398.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
1398.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
1398.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
1398.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

1398.HK vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (1398.HK) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


1398.HK^GSPCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.38

1398.HK vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


1398.HK^GSPCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

1.90

-1.57

Drawdowns

1398.HK vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 1398.HK drawdown since its inception was -61.33%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -8.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 1398.HK and ^GSPC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


1398.HK^GSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.33%

-8.77%

-52.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.82%

-3.01%

-1.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.10%

-1.10%

-17.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.03%

Volatility

1398.HK vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


1398.HK^GSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.68%

12.19%

+6.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.51%

12.19%

+8.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.57%

12.19%

+9.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


1398.HK and ^GSPC have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 1398.HK and ^GSPC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer