PortfoliosLab logo
1288.HK vs. RILY
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between 1288.HK and RILY is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

1288.HK vs. RILY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Agricultural Bank Of China (1288.HK) and B. Riley Financial, Inc. (RILY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

1288.HK:

1.63

RILY:

-0.71

Sortino Ratio

1288.HK:

2.36

RILY:

-1.67

Omega Ratio

1288.HK:

1.33

RILY:

0.79

Calmar Ratio

1288.HK:

3.04

RILY:

-0.93

Martin Ratio

1288.HK:

11.28

RILY:

-1.17

Ulcer Index

1288.HK:

4.69%

RILY:

76.93%

Daily Std Dev

1288.HK:

27.92%

RILY:

127.77%

Max Drawdown

1288.HK:

-51.04%

RILY:

-99.26%

Current Drawdown

1288.HK:

-3.95%

RILY:

-97.36%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

1288.HK:

HK$2.06T

RILY:

$92.10M

EPS

1288.HK:

HK$0.79

RILY:

-$23.45

PEG Ratio

1288.HK:

1.82

RILY:

0.00

PS Ratio

1288.HK:

3.56

RILY:

0.11

PB Ratio

1288.HK:

0.52

RILY:

0.77

Total Revenue (TTM)

1288.HK:

HK$711.06B

RILY:

$865.51M

Gross Profit (TTM)

1288.HK:

HK$180.77B

RILY:

$541.27M

EBITDA (TTM)

1288.HK:

HK$77.88B

RILY:

-$88.37M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 1288.HK achieves a 12.92% return, which is significantly higher than RILY's -34.20% return. Over the past 10 years, 1288.HK has outperformed RILY with an annualized return of 9.33%, while RILY has yielded a comparatively lower -7.54% annualized return.


1288.HK

YTD

12.92%

1M

9.71%

6M

24.44%

1Y

43.47%

5Y*

18.92%

10Y*

9.33%

RILY

YTD

-34.20%

1M

1.68%

6M

-42.15%

1Y

-90.45%

5Y*

-24.67%

10Y*

-7.54%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

1288.HK vs. RILY — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

1288.HK
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of 1288.HK is 9393
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of 1288.HK is 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of 1288.HK is 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of 1288.HK is 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of 1288.HK is 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of 1288.HK is 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

RILY
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RILY is 88
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RILY is 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RILY is 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RILY is 66
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RILY is 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RILY is 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

1288.HK vs. RILY - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Agricultural Bank Of China (1288.HK) and B. Riley Financial, Inc. (RILY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current 1288.HK Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is higher than the RILY Sharpe Ratio of -0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 1288.HK and RILY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

1288.HK vs. RILY - Dividend Comparison

1288.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.81%, less than RILY's 16.56% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
1288.HK
Agricultural Bank Of China
7.81%5.72%8.01%9.03%8.37%7.04%5.77%6.42%5.35%6.13%7.28%5.69%
RILY
B. Riley Financial, Inc.
16.56%21.79%19.06%11.70%7.88%2.09%2.88%5.21%3.70%1.52%3.23%0.30%

Drawdowns

1288.HK vs. RILY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 1288.HK drawdown since its inception was -51.04%, smaller than the maximum RILY drawdown of -99.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 1288.HK and RILY. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

1288.HK vs. RILY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Agricultural Bank Of China (1288.HK) is 5.83%, while B. Riley Financial, Inc. (RILY) has a volatility of 18.85%. This indicates that 1288.HK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RILY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

1288.HK vs. RILY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Agricultural Bank Of China and B. Riley Financial, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00B100.00B150.00B200.00B20212022202320242025
186.60B
270.78M
(1288.HK) Total Revenue
(RILY) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. 1288.HK values in HKD, RILY values in USD