1288.HK vs. RILY

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

1288.HK (Agricultural Bank Of China) and RILY (B. Riley Financial, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Financial Services sector — 1288.HK in Banks - Diversified, RILY in Financial Conglomerates. Over the past 10 years, 1288.HK returned 15.26%/yr vs 4.43%/yr for RILY. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

1288.HK vs. RILY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a HK$10,000 investment in Agricultural Bank Of China (1288.HK) and B. Riley Financial, Inc. (RILY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

1288.HK is traded in HKD, while RILY is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the RILY values have been converted to HKD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 1288.HK achieves a 3.04% return, which is significantly lower than RILY's 82.55% return. Over the past 10 years, 1288.HK has outperformed RILY with an annualized return of 15.26%, while RILY has yielded a comparatively lower 4.43% annualized return.

1288.HK

• 1D: -0.51%
• 1M: -2.19%
• YTD: 3.04%
• 6M: 5.04%
• 1Y: 18.05%
• 3Y*: 35.76%
• 5Y*: 23.04%
• 10Y*: 15.26%

RILY

• 1D: -7.44%
• 1M: -5.38%
• YTD: 82.55%
• 6M: 121.40%
• 1Y: 188.63%
• 3Y*: -37.23%
• 5Y*: -29.52%
• 10Y*: 4.43%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

1288.HK vs. RILY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
1288.HK Agricultural Bank Of China	3.04%	40.81%	57.87%	22.69%	9.04%	1.73%	-11.56%	6.07%	-0.97%	20.81%
RILY B. Riley Financial, Inc.	82.55%	1.94%	-77.40%	-30.80%	-58.36%	142.23%	84.01%	82.49%	-20.10%	3.53%

Correlation

The correlation between 1288.HK and RILY is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.07
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.00
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.03
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2015	0.05

The correlation between 1288.HK and RILY shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.05 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

1288.HK vs. RILY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

1288.HK

1288.HK Risk / Return Rank: 64
1288.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
1288.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
1288.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 59
1288.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
1288.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 64

RILY

RILY Risk / Return Rank: 85
RILY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
RILY Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
RILY Omega Ratio Rank: 81
RILY Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
RILY Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

1288.HK vs. RILY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Agricultural Bank Of China (1288.HK) and B. Riley Financial, Inc. (RILY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	1288.HK	RILY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.91	1.76	-0.85
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.36	2.82	-1.46
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.31	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.13	3.75	-2.62
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.45	7.90	-5.45
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

1288.HK vs. RILY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 1288.HK Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is lower than the RILY Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 1288.HK and RILY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	1288.HK	RILY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91	1.76	-0.85
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.10	-0.31	+1.41
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.72	0.06	+0.66
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.42	0.06	+0.36

Drawdowns

1288.HK vs. RILY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 1288.HK drawdown since its inception was -51.04%, smaller than the maximum RILY drawdown of -96.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 1288.HK and RILY.

Drawdown Indicators

	1288.HK	RILY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.04%	-96.04%	+45.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.35%	-50.58%	+33.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.39%	-94.78%	+77.39%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.31%	-96.04%	+73.73%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.68%	-96.04%	+54.36%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.75%	-87.91%	+83.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.54%	-34.74%	+17.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.93%	23.99%	-16.06%

Volatility

1288.HK vs. RILY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Agricultural Bank Of China (1288.HK) is 6.32%, while B. Riley Financial, Inc. (RILY) has a volatility of 25.74%. This indicates that 1288.HK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RILY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	1288.HK	RILY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.32%	25.74%	-19.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.21%	78.21%	-63.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.69%	108.08%	-86.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.64%	94.33%	-72.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.88%	73.17%	-51.29%

Dividends

1288.HK vs. RILY - Dividend Comparison

1288.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.20%, while RILY has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
1288.HK Agricultural Bank Of China	7.20%	6.84%	5.72%	8.01%	9.03%	8.37%	7.01%	5.77%	6.42%	5.35%	6.13%	7.28%
RILY B. Riley Financial, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	21.79%	19.06%	11.70%	14.07%	2.77%	3.22%	2.25%	3.92%	1.52%	2.63%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both 1288.HK and RILY in my portfolio?

1288.HK and RILY have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.