1288.HK vs. RILY
Compare and contrast key facts about Agricultural Bank Of China (1288.HK) and B. Riley Financial, Inc. (RILY).
Performance
1288.HK vs. RILY - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
1288.HK vs. RILY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1288.HK Agricultural Bank Of China | -1.73% | 40.81% | 57.87% | 22.69% | 9.04% | 2.09% | -11.87% | 6.07% | -0.97% | 20.81% |
RILY B. Riley Financial, Inc. | 46.75% | 1.94% | -77.40% | -30.80% | -58.36% | 142.23% | 84.01% | 82.49% | -20.10% | 3.53% |
Different Trading Currencies
1288.HK is traded in HKD, while RILY is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the RILY values have been converted to HKD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 1288.HK achieves a -1.73% return, which is significantly lower than RILY's 46.75% return. Over the past 10 years, 1288.HK has outperformed RILY with an annualized return of 15.03%, while RILY has yielded a comparatively lower 1.60% annualized return.
1288.HK
- 1D
- 1.79%
- 1M
- 8.40%
- YTD
- -1.73%
- 6M
- 11.96%
- 1Y
- 26.44%
- 3Y*
- 35.30%
- 5Y*
- 22.03%
- 10Y*
- 15.03%
RILY
- 1D
- -0.94%
- 1M
- 4.83%
- YTD
- 46.75%
- 6M
- 9.30%
- 1Y
- 76.19%
- 3Y*
- -34.73%
- 5Y*
- -29.68%
- 10Y*
- 1.60%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
1288.HK vs. RILY — Risk / Return Rank
1288.HK
RILY
1288.HK vs. RILY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Agricultural Bank Of China (1288.HK) and B. Riley Financial, Inc. (RILY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 1288.HK | RILY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.13 | 0.72 | +0.41 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.57 | 1.90 | -0.33 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.21 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.12 | 1.51 | -0.39 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.39 | 3.02 | -0.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 1288.HK | RILY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.13 | 0.72 | +0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.06 | -0.32 | +1.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 | 0.02 | +0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.03 | +0.38 |
Correlation
The correlation between 1288.HK and RILY is 0.05, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
1288.HK vs. RILY - Dividend Comparison
1288.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.74%, while RILY has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1288.HK Agricultural Bank Of China | 4.74% | 6.84% | 5.72% | 8.01% | 9.03% | 8.37% | 7.04% | 5.77% | 6.42% | 5.35% | 6.13% | 7.28% |
RILY B. Riley Financial, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 21.79% | 19.06% | 11.70% | 14.07% | 2.77% | 3.22% | 2.25% | 3.92% | 1.52% | 2.63% |
Drawdowns
1288.HK vs. RILY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 1288.HK drawdown since its inception was -51.04%, smaller than the maximum RILY drawdown of -96.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 1288.HK and RILY.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| 1288.HK | RILY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.04% | -96.02% | +44.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.35% | -50.60% | +33.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.31% | -96.02% | +73.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.68% | -96.02% | +54.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.49% | -90.33% | +81.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.69% | -33.90% | +16.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.10% | 25.35% | -17.25% |
Volatility
1288.HK vs. RILY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Agricultural Bank Of China (1288.HK) is 6.68%, while B. Riley Financial, Inc. (RILY) has a volatility of 21.78%. This indicates that 1288.HK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RILY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| 1288.HK | RILY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.68% | 21.78% | -15.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.76% | 80.84% | -65.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.06% | 107.03% | -82.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.49% | 93.76% | -72.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.82% | 72.70% | -50.88% |
Financials
1288.HK vs. RILY - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Agricultural Bank Of China and B. Riley Financial, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities