PortfoliosLab logo
1288.HK vs. BNP.PA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between 1288.HK and BNP.PA is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

1288.HK vs. BNP.PA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Agricultural Bank Of China (1288.HK) and BNP Paribas SA (BNP.PA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

1288.HK:

1.86

BNP.PA:

0.63

Sortino Ratio

1288.HK:

2.29

BNP.PA:

0.95

Omega Ratio

1288.HK:

1.31

BNP.PA:

1.12

Calmar Ratio

1288.HK:

2.92

BNP.PA:

0.72

Martin Ratio

1288.HK:

10.86

BNP.PA:

1.61

Ulcer Index

1288.HK:

4.68%

BNP.PA:

9.74%

Daily Std Dev

1288.HK:

28.30%

BNP.PA:

26.63%

Max Drawdown

1288.HK:

-51.04%

BNP.PA:

-75.43%

Current Drawdown

1288.HK:

-4.15%

BNP.PA:

-5.00%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

1288.HK:

HK$2.04T

BNP.PA:

€87.54B

EPS

1288.HK:

HK$0.79

BNP.PA:

€9.49

PE Ratio

1288.HK:

5.99

BNP.PA:

8.17

PEG Ratio

1288.HK:

1.78

BNP.PA:

2.03

PS Ratio

1288.HK:

3.53

BNP.PA:

1.90

PB Ratio

1288.HK:

0.51

BNP.PA:

0.66

Total Revenue (TTM)

1288.HK:

HK$711.06B

BNP.PA:

€77.80B

Gross Profit (TTM)

1288.HK:

HK$180.77B

BNP.PA:

€50.30B

EBITDA (TTM)

1288.HK:

HK$77.88B

BNP.PA:

€9.57B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 1288.HK achieves a 12.69% return, which is significantly lower than BNP.PA's 30.87% return. Over the past 10 years, 1288.HK has outperformed BNP.PA with an annualized return of 9.20%, while BNP.PA has yielded a comparatively lower 8.38% annualized return.


1288.HK

YTD

12.69%

1M

11.75%

6M

24.18%

1Y

43.17%

5Y*

18.55%

10Y*

9.20%

BNP.PA

YTD

30.87%

1M

15.28%

6M

29.69%

1Y

16.18%

5Y*

28.25%

10Y*

8.38%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

1288.HK vs. BNP.PA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

1288.HK
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of 1288.HK is 9393
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of 1288.HK is 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of 1288.HK is 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of 1288.HK is 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of 1288.HK is 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of 1288.HK is 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

BNP.PA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BNP.PA is 7070
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BNP.PA is 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BNP.PA is 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BNP.PA is 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BNP.PA is 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BNP.PA is 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

1288.HK vs. BNP.PA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Agricultural Bank Of China (1288.HK) and BNP Paribas SA (BNP.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current 1288.HK Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is higher than the BNP.PA Sharpe Ratio of 0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 1288.HK and BNP.PA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

1288.HK vs. BNP.PA - Dividend Comparison

1288.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.82%, more than BNP.PA's 5.94% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
1288.HK
Agricultural Bank Of China
7.82%5.72%8.01%9.03%8.37%7.04%5.77%6.42%5.35%6.13%7.28%5.69%
BNP.PA
BNP Paribas SA
5.94%7.77%6.23%6.89%4.38%0.00%5.72%7.65%4.34%3.82%2.87%3.05%

Drawdowns

1288.HK vs. BNP.PA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 1288.HK drawdown since its inception was -51.04%, smaller than the maximum BNP.PA drawdown of -75.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 1288.HK and BNP.PA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

1288.HK vs. BNP.PA - Volatility Comparison

Agricultural Bank Of China (1288.HK) has a higher volatility of 11.81% compared to BNP Paribas SA (BNP.PA) at 10.07%. This indicates that 1288.HK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BNP.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

1288.HK vs. BNP.PA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Agricultural Bank Of China and BNP Paribas SA. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00B100.00B150.00B200.00B20212022202320242025
186.60B
12.96B
(1288.HK) Total Revenue
(BNP.PA) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. 1288.HK values in HKD, BNP.PA values in EUR