1398.HK vs. 9909.HK
Compare and contrast key facts about Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (1398.HK) and Powerlong Commercial Mgmt Holdings (9909.HK).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: 1398.HK or 9909.HK.
Key characteristics
| 1398.HK | 9909.HK | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 18.59% | 12.54% |
| 1Y Return | 11.41% | -25.08% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 4.58% | -50.02% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.84 | -0.53 |
| Daily Std Dev | 20.77% | 58.45% |
| Max Drawdown | -61.25% | -91.72% |
| Current Drawdown | -10.14% | -87.80% |
Fundamentals
| 1398.HK | 9909.HK | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | HK$1.95T | HK$1.95B |
| EPS | HK$1.00 | HK$0.00 |
| PE Ratio | 4.08 | 3.95 |
| Revenue (TTM) | HK$653.59B | HK$2.64B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | HK$735.57B | HK$834.42M |
Correlation
The correlation between 1398.HK and 9909.HK is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
1398.HK vs. 9909.HK - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, 1398.HK achieves a 18.59% return, which is significantly higher than 9909.HK's 12.54% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
1398.HK vs. 9909.HK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (1398.HK) and Powerlong Commercial Mgmt Holdings (9909.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
1398.HK vs. 9909.HK - Dividend Comparison
1398.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.27%, less than 9909.HK's 9.55% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1398.HK Industrial and Commercial Bank of China | 7.27% | 8.62% | 8.54% | 7.27% | 5.74% | 4.75% | 5.19% | 4.25% | 5.92% | 6.92% | 5.82% | 5.78% |
9909.HK Powerlong Commercial Mgmt Holdings | 9.55% | 10.75% | 6.97% | 2.28% | 1.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
1398.HK vs. 9909.HK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 1398.HK drawdown since its inception was -61.25%, smaller than the maximum 9909.HK drawdown of -91.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 1398.HK and 9909.HK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
1398.HK vs. 9909.HK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (1398.HK) is 5.57%, while Powerlong Commercial Mgmt Holdings (9909.HK) has a volatility of 16.45%. This indicates that 1398.HK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 9909.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
1398.HK vs. 9909.HK - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Industrial and Commercial Bank of China and Powerlong Commercial Mgmt Holdings. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities