1258.HK vs. AGG

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

1258.HK (China Nonferrous Mining Corp Ltd) is a stock, while AGG (iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF) is Total Bond Market fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. Over the past 10 years, 1258.HK returned 37.14%/yr vs 1.69%/yr for AGG. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions.

Performance

1258.HK vs. AGG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a HK$10,000 investment in China Nonferrous Mining Corp Ltd (1258.HK) and iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

1258.HK is traded in HKD, while AGG is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the AGG values have been converted to HKD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 1258.HK achieves a 0.54% return, which is significantly lower than AGG's 1.06% return. Over the past 10 years, 1258.HK has outperformed AGG with an annualized return of 37.14%, while AGG has yielded a comparatively lower 1.69% annualized return.

1258.HK

• 1D: -3.83%
• 1M: 16.96%
• YTD: 0.54%
• 6M: -7.60%
• 1Y: 158.58%
• 3Y*: 65.27%
• 5Y*: 37.70%
• 10Y*: 37.14%

AGG

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: 0.19%
• YTD: 1.06%
• 6M: 1.14%
• 1Y: 4.51%
• 3Y*: 3.99%
• 5Y*: 0.33%
• 10Y*: 1.69%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

1258.HK vs. AGG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
1258.HK China Nonferrous Mining Corp Ltd	0.54%	194.48%	5.75%	35.92%	40.31%	45.08%	25.68%	-2.94%	-8.04%	55.71%
AGG iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF	1.06%	7.40%	0.79%	5.64%	-12.87%	-1.24%	6.99%	7.88%	0.32%	4.35%

Correlation

The correlation between 1258.HK and AGG is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.02
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.07
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.06
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.07
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2012	-0.06

Return for Risk

1258.HK vs. AGG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

1258.HK

1258.HK Risk / Return Rank: 88
1258.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
1258.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
1258.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 85
1258.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
1258.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 87

AGG

AGG Risk / Return Rank: 35
AGG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
AGG Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
AGG Omega Ratio Rank: 33
AGG Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
AGG Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

1258.HK vs. AGG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for China Nonferrous Mining Corp Ltd (1258.HK) and iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	1258.HK	AGG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.59	1.17	+1.42
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.85	1.72	+1.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.20	+0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.92	1.72	+2.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.99	5.27	+4.71
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

1258.HK vs. AGG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 1258.HK Sharpe Ratio is 2.59, which is higher than the AGG Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 1258.HK and AGG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	1258.HK	AGG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.59	1.17	+1.42
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72	0.05	+0.66
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.66	0.31	+0.34
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.35	0.57	-0.23

Drawdowns

1258.HK vs. AGG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 1258.HK drawdown since its inception was -70.14%, which is greater than AGG's maximum drawdown of -17.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 1258.HK and AGG.

Drawdown Indicators

	1258.HK	AGG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-70.14%	-17.39%	-52.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-42.02%	-2.63%	-39.39%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-47.52%	-6.07%	-41.45%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-47.52%	-17.07%	-30.45%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-59.44%	-17.39%	-42.05%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.65%	-1.28%	-17.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-31.11%	-2.86%	-28.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.29%	0.86%	+15.43%

Volatility

1258.HK vs. AGG - Volatility Comparison

China Nonferrous Mining Corp Ltd (1258.HK) has a higher volatility of 19.10% compared to iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG) at 1.29%. This indicates that 1258.HK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AGG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	1258.HK	AGG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	19.10%	1.29%	+17.81%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	47.73%	2.78%	+44.95%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	63.50%	3.91%	+59.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	54.14%	6.09%	+48.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	58.26%	5.40%	+52.86%

Dividends

1258.HK vs. AGG - Dividend Comparison

1258.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.27%, less than AGG's 3.98% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
1258.HK China Nonferrous Mining Corp Ltd	2.27%	2.28%	4.43%	4.31%	7.48%	3.59%	2.73%	3.61%	2.45%	0.00%	0.00%	1.30%
AGG iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF	3.98%	3.89%	3.74%	3.13%	2.39%	1.77%	2.14%	2.70%	2.72%	2.32%	2.39%	2.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both 1258.HK and AGG in my portfolio?

1258.HK and AGG have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.