PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
1258.HK vs. PFC.NS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

1258.HK vs. PFC.NS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a HK$10,000 investment in China Nonferrous Mining Corp Ltd (1258.HK) and Power Finance Corporation Limited (PFC.NS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

1258.HK is traded in HKD, while PFC.NS is traded in INR. To make them comparable, the PFC.NS values have been converted to HKD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 1258.HK achieves a 0.54% return, which is significantly lower than PFC.NS's 14.75% return. Over the past 10 years, 1258.HK has outperformed PFC.NS with an annualized return of 37.14%, while PFC.NS has yielded a comparatively lower 18.67% annualized return.


1258.HK

1D
-3.83%
1M
16.96%
YTD
0.54%
6M
-7.60%
1Y
158.58%
3Y*
65.27%
5Y*
37.70%
10Y*
37.14%

PFC.NS

1D
2.31%
1M
-7.71%
YTD
14.75%
6M
15.83%
1Y
-2.15%
3Y*
38.52%
5Y*
32.39%
10Y*
18.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

1258.HK vs. PFC.NS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
1258.HK
China Nonferrous Mining Corp Ltd
0.54%194.48%5.75%35.92%40.31%45.08%25.68%-2.94%-8.04%55.71%
PFC.NS
Power Finance Corporation Limited
14.75%-21.12%17.33%250.06%12.35%4.31%-5.58%6.51%-19.03%7.10%

Correlation

The correlation between 1258.HK and PFC.NS is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2012

0.07

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

1258.HK vs. PFC.NS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

1258.HK
1258.HK Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
1258.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
1258.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
1258.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
1258.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
1258.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

PFC.NS
PFC.NS Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
PFC.NS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFC.NS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFC.NS Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
PFC.NS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFC.NS Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

1258.HK vs. PFC.NS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for China Nonferrous Mining Corp Ltd (1258.HK) and Power Finance Corporation Limited (PFC.NS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


1258.HKPFC.NSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.01

+0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.92

-0.08

+4.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.99

-0.18

+10.17

1258.HK vs. PFC.NS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 1258.HK Sharpe Ratio is 2.59, which is higher than the PFC.NS Sharpe Ratio of -0.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 1258.HK and PFC.NS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


1258.HKPFC.NSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.59

-0.08

+2.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

0.90

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

0.49

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.15

+0.20

Drawdowns

1258.HK vs. PFC.NS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 1258.HK drawdown since its inception was -70.14%, smaller than the maximum PFC.NS drawdown of -82.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 1258.HK and PFC.NS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


1258.HKPFC.NSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.14%

-82.39%

+12.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.02%

-25.56%

-16.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-47.52%

-42.70%

-4.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.52%

-42.70%

-4.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.44%

-61.88%

+2.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.65%

-29.63%

+10.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.11%

-48.88%

+17.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.29%

11.89%

+4.40%

Volatility

1258.HK vs. PFC.NS - Volatility Comparison

China Nonferrous Mining Corp Ltd (1258.HK) has a higher volatility of 19.10% compared to Power Finance Corporation Limited (PFC.NS) at 7.97%. This indicates that 1258.HK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFC.NS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


1258.HKPFC.NSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.10%

7.97%

+11.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

47.73%

23.79%

+23.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

63.50%

28.38%

+35.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

54.14%

36.80%

+17.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

58.26%

38.96%

+19.30%

Dividends

1258.HK vs. PFC.NS - Dividend Comparison

1258.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.27%, less than PFC.NS's 3.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
1258.HK
China Nonferrous Mining Corp Ltd
2.27%2.28%4.43%4.31%7.48%3.59%2.73%3.61%2.45%0.00%0.00%1.30%
PFC.NS
Power Finance Corporation Limited
3.92%4.61%3.51%2.03%4.53%1.07%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

1258.HK vs. PFC.NS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between China Nonferrous Mining Corp Ltd and Power Finance Corporation Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. 1258.HK values in HKD, PFC.NS values in INR

Frequently Asked Questions


1258.HK and PFC.NS have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 1258.HK and PFC.NS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer