0P4F.L vs. ASML
0P4F.L (Ford Motor Company) and ASML (ASML Holding N.V.) are both stocks. 0P4F.L operates in Auto Manufacturers (Consumer Cyclical), while ASML operates in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials (Technology). Over the past 10 years, 0P4F.L returned 6.75%/yr vs 36.00%/yr for ASML. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
0P4F.L vs. ASML - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 0P4F.L achieves a 12.22% return, which is significantly lower than ASML's 74.80% return. Over the past 10 years, 0P4F.L has underperformed ASML with an annualized return of 6.75%, while ASML has yielded a comparatively higher 36.00% annualized return.
0P4F.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.07%
- YTD
- 12.22%
- 6M
- 7.84%
- 1Y
- 45.02%
- 3Y*
- 6.40%
- 5Y*
- 8.96%
- 10Y*
- 6.75%
ASML
- 1D
- -1.89%
- 1M
- 17.61%
- YTD
- 74.80%
- 6M
- 73.02%
- 1Y
- 146.81%
- 3Y*
- 37.59%
- 5Y*
- 22.97%
- 10Y*
- 36.00%
0P4F.L vs. ASML - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0P4F.L Ford Motor Company | 12.22% | 42.85% | -16.71% | 11.98% | -42.26% | 132.07% | -2.95% | 28.68% | -34.54% | 5.46% |
ASML ASML Holding N.V. | 74.80% | 56.51% | -7.70% | 39.91% | -30.49% | 64.13% | 66.06% | 93.56% | -9.80% | 56.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between 0P4F.L and ASML is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2013 | 0.18 |
Fundamentals
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
0P4F.L vs. ASML — Risk / Return Rank
0P4F.L
ASML
0P4F.L vs. ASML - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ford Motor Company (0P4F.L) and ASML Holding N.V. (ASML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| 0P4F.L | ASML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.45 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.02 | 7.83 | -5.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.30 | 21.08 | -15.77 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
0P4F.L vs. ASML - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 0P4F.L drawdown since its inception was -66.41%, smaller than the maximum ASML drawdown of -90.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 0P4F.L and ASML.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 0P4F.L | ASML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.41% | -90.00% | +23.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.11% | -17.85% | -4.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.17% | -45.38% | +7.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.38% | -56.84% | -4.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.91% | -56.84% | -6.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.24% | -1.89% | -29.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.79% | -28.12% | -0.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.44% | 6.63% | +1.81% |
Volatility
0P4F.L vs. ASML - Volatility Comparison
Ford Motor Company (0P4F.L) has a higher volatility of 20.08% compared to ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) at 17.27%. This indicates that 0P4F.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ASML based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 0P4F.L | ASML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.08% | 17.27% | +2.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.46% | 34.58% | -5.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.63% | 42.75% | -5.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.55% | 42.44% | -4.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.11% | 38.72% | +5.39% |
Dividends
0P4F.L vs. ASML - Dividend Comparison
0P4F.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.15%, more than ASML's 0.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0P4F.L Ford Motor Company | 4.15% | 5.68% | 4.53% | 3.64% | 4.37% | 0.49% | 1.69% | 6.47% | 9.49% | 5.17% | 4.77% | 4.58% |
ASML ASML Holding N.V. | 0.47% | 0.97% | 0.97% | 0.86% | 1.27% | 0.50% | 0.50% | 1.40% | 0.94% | 0.64% | 0.92% | 0.73% |
Financials
0P4F.L vs. ASML - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ford Motor Company and ASML Holding N.V.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
0P4F.L and ASML have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for 0P4F.L and ASML
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer