PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
0OFM.L vs. NVO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

0OFM.L vs. NVO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Compagnie Generale des Etablissements Michelin SCA (0OFM.L) and Novo Nordisk A/S (NVO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

0OFM.L is traded in EUR, while NVO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the NVO values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 0OFM.L achieves a 18.38% return, which is significantly higher than NVO's -10.90% return. Over the past 10 years, 0OFM.L has outperformed NVO with an annualized return of 6.78%, while NVO has yielded a comparatively lower 6.17% annualized return.


0OFM.L

1D
0.08%
1M
2.85%
YTD
18.38%
6M
18.46%
1Y
1.60%
3Y*
9.63%
5Y*
3.64%
10Y*
6.78%

NVO

1D
-1.02%
1M
-4.27%
YTD
-10.90%
6M
-6.13%
1Y
-38.52%
3Y*
-18.77%
5Y*
4.49%
10Y*
6.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

0OFM.L vs. NVO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
0OFM.L
Compagnie Generale des Etablissements Michelin SCA
18.38%-8.21%1.98%27.99%-23.64%39.34%-0.97%30.40%-25.79%17.13%
NVO
Novo Nordisk A/S
-10.90%-46.43%-10.38%50.20%30.26%75.75%13.17%31.61%-8.89%34.13%

Correlation

The correlation between 0OFM.L and NVO is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2007

0.12

Fundamentals

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

0OFM.L vs. NVO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

0OFM.L
0OFM.L Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
0OFM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
0OFM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
0OFM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
0OFM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
0OFM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

NVO
NVO Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
NVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVO Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
NVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVO Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

0OFM.L vs. NVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Compagnie Generale des Etablissements Michelin SCA (0OFM.L) and Novo Nordisk A/S (NVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


0OFM.LNVODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

0.87

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.13

-0.71

+0.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.28

-1.03

+1.31

0OFM.L vs. NVO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 0OFM.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.12, which is higher than the NVO Sharpe Ratio of -0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 0OFM.L and NVO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


0OFM.LNVODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

-0.76

+0.88

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

0.12

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

0.19

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

0.48

-0.32

Drawdowns

0OFM.L vs. NVO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 0OFM.L drawdown since its inception was -73.51%, roughly equal to the maximum NVO drawdown of -76.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 0OFM.L and NVO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


0OFM.LNVODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.51%

-76.45%

+2.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.78%

-54.72%

+33.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.69%

-76.45%

+47.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.00%

-76.45%

+36.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.07%

-76.45%

+34.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.29%

-70.97%

+61.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.01%

-13.75%

-4.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.93%

37.49%

-27.56%

Volatility

0OFM.L vs. NVO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Compagnie Generale des Etablissements Michelin SCA (0OFM.L) is 5.86%, while Novo Nordisk A/S (NVO) has a volatility of 8.36%. This indicates that 0OFM.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


0OFM.LNVODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.86%

8.36%

-2.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.93%

37.34%

-20.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.57%

50.90%

-28.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.30%

37.93%

-13.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.35%

32.43%

-7.08%

Dividends

0OFM.L vs. NVO - Dividend Comparison

0OFM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.33%, more than NVO's 4.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
0OFM.L
Compagnie Generale des Etablissements Michelin SCA
4.33%4.91%4.23%3.85%4.25%1.59%1.90%3.40%4.11%2.71%2.70%2.83%
NVO
Novo Nordisk A/S
4.20%3.31%1.68%1.00%1.20%1.35%1.87%2.14%1.45%1.52%2.87%0.92%

Financials

0OFM.L vs. NVO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Compagnie Generale des Etablissements Michelin SCA and Novo Nordisk A/S. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


30.00B40.00B50.00B60.00B70.00B80.00B90.00B100.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
96.82B
(0OFM.L) Total Revenue
(NVO) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. 0OFM.L values in EUR, NVO values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


0OFM.L and NVO have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 0OFM.L and NVO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer