PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
0OFM.L vs. PAF.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

0OFM.L vs. PAF.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Compagnie Generale des Etablissements Michelin SCA (0OFM.L) and Pan African Resources plc (PAF.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

0OFM.L is traded in EUR, while PAF.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the PAF.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 0OFM.L achieves a 18.15% return, which is significantly higher than PAF.L's -6.63% return. Over the past 10 years, 0OFM.L has underperformed PAF.L with an annualized return of 6.75%, while PAF.L has yielded a comparatively higher 25.06% annualized return.


0OFM.L

1D
-0.34%
1M
7.60%
YTD
18.15%
6M
18.03%
1Y
1.11%
3Y*
9.26%
5Y*
3.60%
10Y*
6.75%

PAF.L

1D
-2.16%
1M
-20.25%
YTD
-6.63%
6M
7.32%
1Y
130.43%
3Y*
104.34%
5Y*
44.87%
10Y*
25.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

0OFM.L vs. PAF.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
0OFM.L
Compagnie Generale des Etablissements Michelin SCA
18.15%-8.21%1.98%27.99%-23.64%39.34%-0.97%30.40%-25.79%17.13%
PAF.L
Pan African Resources plc
-6.63%239.35%119.42%8.63%-1.23%-20.94%91.94%49.76%-35.74%-15.23%

Correlation

The correlation between 0OFM.L and PAF.L is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2007

0.05

The correlation between 0OFM.L and PAF.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (10 years) to 0.16 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

0OFM.L vs. PAF.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

0OFM.L
0OFM.L Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
0OFM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
0OFM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
0OFM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
0OFM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
0OFM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

PAF.L
PAF.L Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
PAF.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAF.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAF.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
PAF.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAF.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

0OFM.L vs. PAF.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Compagnie Generale des Etablissements Michelin SCA (0OFM.L) and Pan African Resources plc (PAF.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


0OFM.LPAF.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.36

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.05

3.37

-3.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.11

11.14

-11.03

0OFM.L vs. PAF.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 0OFM.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.05, which is lower than the PAF.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 0OFM.L and PAF.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


0OFM.LPAF.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

2.42

-2.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

0.93

-0.78

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

0.47

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

0.36

-0.19

Drawdowns

0OFM.L vs. PAF.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 0OFM.L drawdown since its inception was -73.51%, smaller than the maximum PAF.L drawdown of -85.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 0OFM.L and PAF.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


0OFM.LPAF.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.51%

-85.44%

+11.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.78%

-38.46%

+17.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.69%

-38.46%

+9.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.00%

-49.13%

+9.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.07%

-71.57%

+29.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.46%

-38.46%

+29.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.01%

-30.28%

+12.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.92%

11.66%

-1.74%

Volatility

0OFM.L vs. PAF.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Compagnie Generale des Etablissements Michelin SCA (0OFM.L) is 6.47%, while Pan African Resources plc (PAF.L) has a volatility of 22.58%. This indicates that 0OFM.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PAF.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


0OFM.LPAF.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.47%

22.58%

-16.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.11%

44.33%

-27.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.77%

53.61%

-30.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.33%

48.29%

-23.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.37%

53.72%

-28.35%

Dividends

0OFM.L vs. PAF.L - Dividend Comparison

0OFM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.34%, more than PAF.L's 1.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
0OFM.L
Compagnie Generale des Etablissements Michelin SCA
4.34%4.91%4.23%3.85%4.25%1.59%1.90%3.40%4.11%2.71%2.70%2.83%
PAF.L
Pan African Resources plc
1.96%1.35%2.79%4.52%5.25%5.09%2.92%0.98%0.00%3.37%5.66%6.83%

Financials

0OFM.L vs. PAF.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Compagnie Generale des Etablissements Michelin SCA and Pan African Resources plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
489.40M
(0OFM.L) Total Revenue
(PAF.L) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. 0OFM.L values in EUR, PAF.L values in GBp

Frequently Asked Questions


0OFM.L and PAF.L have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 0OFM.L and PAF.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer