0OFM.L vs. 1ORA.MI
0OFM.L (Compagnie Generale des Etablissements Michelin SCA) and 1ORA.MI (Orange S.A.) are both stocks. 0OFM.L operates in Auto Parts (Consumer Cyclical), while 1ORA.MI operates in Telecom Services (Communication Services). Over the past year, 0OFM.L returned 1.11% vs 49.83% for 1ORA.MI. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
0OFM.L vs. 1ORA.MI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 0OFM.L achieves a 18.15% return, which is significantly lower than 1ORA.MI's 26.51% return.
0OFM.L
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- 7.60%
- YTD
- 18.15%
- 6M
- 18.03%
- 1Y
- 1.11%
- 3Y*
- 9.26%
- 5Y*
- 3.60%
- 10Y*
- 6.75%
1ORA.MI
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 2.67%
- YTD
- 26.51%
- 6M
- 28.82%
- 1Y
- 49.83%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
0OFM.L vs. 1ORA.MI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
0OFM.L Compagnie Generale des Etablissements Michelin SCA | 18.15% | -8.21% | 2.29% |
1ORA.MI Orange S.A. | 26.51% | 57.60% | -0.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between 0OFM.L and 1ORA.MI is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2024 | 0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
0OFM.L vs. 1ORA.MI — Risk / Return Rank
0OFM.L
1ORA.MI
0OFM.L vs. 1ORA.MI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Compagnie Generale des Etablissements Michelin SCA (0OFM.L) and Orange S.A. (1ORA.MI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 0OFM.L | 1ORA.MI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.50 | -0.47 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.05 | 7.26 | -7.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.11 | 21.28 | -21.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 0OFM.L | 1ORA.MI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 | 2.84 | -2.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 2.79 | -2.63 |
Drawdowns
0OFM.L vs. 1ORA.MI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 0OFM.L drawdown since its inception was -73.51%, which is greater than 1ORA.MI's maximum drawdown of -11.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 0OFM.L and 1ORA.MI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 0OFM.L | 1ORA.MI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.51% | -11.13% | -62.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.78% | -9.20% | -11.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.69% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.00% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.46% | -3.40% | -6.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.01% | -1.97% | -16.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.92% | 2.92% | +7.00% |
Volatility
0OFM.L vs. 1ORA.MI - Volatility Comparison
Compagnie Generale des Etablissements Michelin SCA (0OFM.L) has a higher volatility of 6.47% compared to Orange S.A. (1ORA.MI) at 5.56%. This indicates that 0OFM.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 1ORA.MI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 0OFM.L | 1ORA.MI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.47% | 5.56% | +0.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.11% | 17.13% | -0.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.77% | 23.88% | -1.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.33% | 26.04% | -1.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.37% | 26.04% | -0.67% |
Dividends
0OFM.L vs. 1ORA.MI - Dividend Comparison
0OFM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.34%, more than 1ORA.MI's 1.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0OFM.L Compagnie Generale des Etablissements Michelin SCA | 4.34% | 4.91% | 4.23% | 3.85% | 4.25% | 1.59% | 1.90% | 3.40% | 4.11% | 2.71% | 2.70% | 2.83% |
1ORA.MI Orange S.A. | 1.66% | 5.25% | 3.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
0OFM.L vs. 1ORA.MI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Compagnie Generale des Etablissements Michelin SCA and Orange S.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
0OFM.L and 1ORA.MI have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for 0OFM.L and 1ORA.MI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer