0OFM.L vs. 1810.HK

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

0OFM.L (Compagnie Generale des Etablissements Michelin SCA) and 1810.HK (Xiaomi Corp) are both stocks. 0OFM.L operates in Auto Parts (Consumer Cyclical), while 1810.HK operates in Consumer Electronics (Technology). Over the past 5 years, 0OFM.L returned 3.64%/yr vs -0.07%/yr for 1810.HK. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

0OFM.L vs. 1810.HK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Compagnie Generale des Etablissements Michelin SCA (0OFM.L) and Xiaomi Corp (1810.HK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

0OFM.L is traded in EUR, while 1810.HK is traded in HKD. To make them comparable, the 1810.HK values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 0OFM.L achieves a 18.38% return, which is significantly higher than 1810.HK's -27.41% return.

0OFM.L

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 6.42%
• YTD: 18.38%
• 6M: 18.93%
• 1Y: 2.76%
• 3Y*: 9.63%
• 5Y*: 3.64%
• 10Y*: 6.78%

1810.HK

• 1D: -0.77%
• 1M: -6.14%
• YTD: -27.41%
• 6M: -32.63%
• 1Y: -47.70%
• 3Y*: 33.88%
• 5Y*: -0.07%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

0OFM.L vs. 1810.HK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
0OFM.L Compagnie Generale des Etablissements Michelin SCA	18.38%	-8.21%	1.98%	27.99%	-23.64%	39.34%	-0.97%	30.40%	-16.04%
1810.HK Xiaomi Corp	-27.41%	-0.21%	137.98%	38.34%	-38.63%	-38.88%	182.70%	-14.23%	-21.01%

Correlation

The correlation between 0OFM.L and 1810.HK is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.08
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.09
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.08
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2018	0.12

Return for Risk

0OFM.L vs. 1810.HK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

0OFM.L

0OFM.L Risk / Return Rank: 42
0OFM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
0OFM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
0OFM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 38
0OFM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
0OFM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 44

1810.HK

1810.HK Risk / Return Rank: 4
1810.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
1810.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
1810.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 3
1810.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
1810.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

0OFM.L vs. 1810.HK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Compagnie Generale des Etablissements Michelin SCA (0OFM.L) and Xiaomi Corp (1810.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	0OFM.L	1810.HK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.12	-1.38	+1.51
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.33	-2.25	+2.57
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.04	0.75	+0.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.13	-0.91	+1.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.28	-1.51	+1.79
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

0OFM.L vs. 1810.HK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 0OFM.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.12, which is higher than the 1810.HK Sharpe Ratio of -1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 0OFM.L and 1810.HK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	0OFM.L	1810.HK	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.12	-1.38	+1.51
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.15	-0.00	+0.15
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.27	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.16	0.16	+0.01

Drawdowns

0OFM.L vs. 1810.HK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 0OFM.L drawdown since its inception was -73.51%, roughly equal to the maximum 1810.HK drawdown of -70.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 0OFM.L and 1810.HK.

Drawdown Indicators

	0OFM.L	1810.HK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-73.51%	-70.61%	-2.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.78%	-53.14%	+32.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.69%	-55.56%	+26.87%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.00%	-65.18%	+25.18%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.07%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.29%	-54.83%	+45.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.01%	-39.69%	+21.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.93%	31.66%	-21.73%

Volatility

0OFM.L vs. 1810.HK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Compagnie Generale des Etablissements Michelin SCA (0OFM.L) is 5.86%, while Xiaomi Corp (1810.HK) has a volatility of 8.78%. This indicates that 0OFM.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 1810.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	0OFM.L	1810.HK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.86%	8.78%	-2.92%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.93%	25.59%	-8.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.57%	35.05%	-12.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.30%	43.92%	-19.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.35%	45.73%	-20.38%

Dividends

0OFM.L vs. 1810.HK - Dividend Comparison

0OFM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.33%, while 1810.HK has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
0OFM.L Compagnie Generale des Etablissements Michelin SCA	4.33%	4.91%	4.23%	3.85%	4.25%	1.59%	1.90%	3.40%	4.11%	2.71%	2.70%	2.83%
1810.HK Xiaomi Corp	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both 0OFM.L and 1810.HK in my portfolio?

0OFM.L and 1810.HK have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.