PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
0GGH.L vs. GLAB.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

0GGH.L vs. GLAB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (0GGH.L) and SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (GLAB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

0GGH.L is traded in EUR, while GLAB.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the GLAB.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 0GGH.L achieves a -0.41% return, which is significantly lower than GLAB.L's 3.17% return.


0GGH.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.61%
6M
-0.61%
YTD
-0.41%
1Y
1.03%
3Y*
2.12%
5Y*
-1.53%
10Y*

GLAB.L

1D
-0.07%
1M
1.37%
6M
2.33%
YTD
3.17%
1Y
4.70%
3Y*
4.22%
5Y*
0.18%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

0GGH.L vs. GLAB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
0GGH.L
iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc)
-0.41%2.71%1.27%4.35%-13.33%-2.45%3.79%4.91%0.37%
GLAB.L
SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged
3.17%-0.78%8.01%7.99%-16.61%4.66%-1.21%13.21%-0.75%

Correlation

The correlation between 0GGH.L and GLAB.L is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2018

0.39

The correlation between 0GGH.L and GLAB.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (all time) to 0.54 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

0GGH.L vs. GLAB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

0GGH.L
0GGH.L Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
0GGH.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
0GGH.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
0GGH.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
0GGH.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
0GGH.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

GLAB.L
GLAB.L Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
GLAB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLAB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLAB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
GLAB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLAB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

0GGH.L vs. GLAB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (0GGH.L) and SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (GLAB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


0GGH.LGLAB.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.17

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.37

2.03

-1.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.93

5.13

-4.21

0GGH.L vs. GLAB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 0GGH.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.31, which is lower than the GLAB.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 0GGH.L and GLAB.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

0GGH.L vs. GLAB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 0GGH.L drawdown since its inception was -21.17%, which is greater than GLAB.L's maximum drawdown of -19.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 0GGH.L and GLAB.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


0GGH.LGLAB.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.17%

-19.07%

-2.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.80%

-2.30%

-0.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.90%

-6.13%

+2.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.17%

-19.07%

-2.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.63%

-0.94%

-11.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.73%

-5.71%

-3.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.10%

0.91%

+0.19%

Volatility

0GGH.L vs. GLAB.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (0GGH.L) is 0.99%, while SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (GLAB.L) has a volatility of 1.38%. This indicates that 0GGH.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLAB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


0GGH.LGLAB.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.99%

1.38%

-0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.75%

3.64%

-0.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.33%

5.02%

-1.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.28%

7.41%

+16.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.91%

7.72%

+13.19%

0GGH.L vs. GLAB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both 0GGH.L and GLAB.L have an expense ratio of 0.10%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

0GGH.L vs. GLAB.L - Dividend Comparison

0GGH.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GLAB.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.09%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
0GGH.L
iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GLAB.L
SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged
3.09%3.06%2.70%1.91%1.48%1.18%1.51%1.70%0.88%

Frequently Asked Questions


0GGH.L and GLAB.L have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.10% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

0GGH.L and GLAB.L have the same expense ratio: 0.10% per year.

0GGH.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond Index, while GLAB.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg GBP. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 0GGH.L and GLAB.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer