PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLAB.L vs. PFORX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLAB.L vs. PFORX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (GLAB.L) and PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) (PFORX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GLAB.L is traded in GBP, while PFORX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PFORX values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLAB.L achieves a 0.33% return, which is significantly higher than PFORX's 0.23% return.


GLAB.L

1D
-0.31%
1M
0.17%
YTD
0.33%
6M
0.43%
1Y
3.34%
3Y*
3.81%
5Y*
0.19%
10Y*

PFORX

1D
0.24%
1M
1.83%
YTD
0.23%
6M
-0.53%
1Y
3.34%
3Y*
2.68%
5Y*
2.52%
10Y*
3.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLAB.L vs. PFORX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
GLAB.L
SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged
0.33%4.68%3.08%5.73%-12.07%-1.74%4.48%6.42%1.00%
PFORX
PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged)
0.23%-3.10%7.54%4.04%0.33%-0.73%3.05%3.55%12.81%

Correlation

The correlation between GLAB.L and PFORX is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2018

0.14

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLAB.L vs. PFORX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLAB.L
GLAB.L Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
GLAB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLAB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLAB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
GLAB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLAB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

PFORX
PFORX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
PFORX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFORX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFORX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
PFORX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFORX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLAB.L vs. PFORX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (GLAB.L) and PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) (PFORX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GLAB.LPFORXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.10

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.45

0.61

+0.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.24

1.29

+2.95

GLAB.L vs. PFORX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLAB.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is higher than the PFORX Sharpe Ratio of 0.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLAB.L and PFORX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GLAB.LPFORXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.08

0.54

+0.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

0.28

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.68

-0.36

Drawdowns

GLAB.L vs. PFORX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLAB.L drawdown since its inception was -15.68%, roughly equal to the maximum PFORX drawdown of -15.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLAB.L and PFORX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLAB.LPFORXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.68%

-15.78%

+0.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.29%

-5.96%

+3.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.51%

-9.45%

+5.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.45%

-15.78%

+0.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.20%

-5.27%

+4.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.48%

-5.07%

+0.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.78%

2.82%

-2.04%

Volatility

GLAB.L vs. PFORX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (GLAB.L) is 1.45%, while PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) (PFORX) has a volatility of 1.76%. This indicates that GLAB.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PFORX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLAB.LPFORXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.45%

1.76%

-0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.50%

5.33%

-2.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.08%

6.74%

-3.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.53%

8.95%

-4.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.94%

9.74%

-5.80%

GLAB.L vs. PFORX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLAB.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than PFORX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

GLAB.L vs. PFORX - Dividend Comparison

GLAB.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.10%, less than PFORX's 4.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLAB.L
SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged
3.10%3.06%2.70%1.91%1.48%1.18%1.51%1.70%0.88%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PFORX
PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged)
4.10%4.23%4.91%3.02%3.65%1.55%2.46%6.86%2.90%1.46%1.38%9.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


GLAB.L and PFORX have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLAB.L and PFORX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer