0GGH.L vs. FXGB.L
0GGH.L (iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc)) and FXGB.L (First Trust FactorFX UCITS ETF Class B GBP Hedged (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - 0GGH.L is a Global Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond Index, while FXGB.L is a Currency fund tracking the Bloomberg G10 Carry Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, 0GGH.L returned -1.53%/yr vs 5.32%/yr for FXGB.L. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. 0GGH.L charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for FXGB.L.
Performance
0GGH.L vs. FXGB.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
0GGH.L is traded in EUR, while FXGB.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the FXGB.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 0GGH.L achieves a -0.41% return, which is significantly lower than FXGB.L's 9.52% return.
0GGH.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.61%
- 6M
- -0.61%
- YTD
- -0.41%
- 1Y
- 1.03%
- 3Y*
- 2.12%
- 5Y*
- -1.53%
- 10Y*
- —
FXGB.L
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- 3.49%
- 6M
- 7.83%
- YTD
- 9.52%
- 1Y
- 13.20%
- 3Y*
- 6.89%
- 5Y*
- 5.32%
- 10Y*
- —
0GGH.L vs. FXGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0GGH.L iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) | -0.41% | 2.71% | 1.27% | 4.35% | -13.33% | -2.45% | 3.79% | 4.91% | -1.24% | -0.23% |
FXGB.L First Trust FactorFX UCITS ETF Class B GBP Hedged (Acc) | 9.52% | 2.11% | 10.91% | 13.01% | -6.89% | 3.45% | -6.57% | 9.16% | -2.33% | 0.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between 0GGH.L and FXGB.L is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 29, 2017 | -0.02 |
The correlation between 0GGH.L and FXGB.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to -0.01 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
0GGH.L vs. FXGB.L — Risk / Return Rank
0GGH.L
FXGB.L
0GGH.L vs. FXGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (0GGH.L) and First Trust FactorFX UCITS ETF Class B GBP Hedged (Acc) (FXGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| 0GGH.L | FXGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.22 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.37 | 3.47 | -3.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.93 | 8.75 | -7.82 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
0GGH.L vs. FXGB.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 0GGH.L drawdown since its inception was -21.17%, which is greater than FXGB.L's maximum drawdown of -15.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 0GGH.L and FXGB.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 0GGH.L | FXGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.17% | -15.97% | -5.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.80% | -3.79% | +0.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.90% | -7.73% | +3.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.17% | -12.40% | -8.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.63% | 0.00% | -12.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.73% | -4.24% | -4.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.10% | 1.51% | -0.41% |
Volatility
0GGH.L vs. FXGB.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (0GGH.L) is 0.99%, while First Trust FactorFX UCITS ETF Class B GBP Hedged (Acc) (FXGB.L) has a volatility of 2.47%. This indicates that 0GGH.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FXGB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 0GGH.L | FXGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.99% | 2.47% | -1.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.75% | 7.86% | -5.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.33% | 11.02% | -7.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.28% | 9.73% | +14.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.91% | 9.57% | +11.34% |
0GGH.L vs. FXGB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
0GGH.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than FXGB.L's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
0GGH.L vs. FXGB.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither 0GGH.L nor FXGB.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
0GGH.L and FXGB.L have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, 0GGH.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
0GGH.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FXGB.L.
0GGH.L is categorized as Global Bonds, while FXGB.L is Currency. 0GGH.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond Index, while FXGB.L tracks Bloomberg G10 Carry Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for 0GGH.L and 0.75% for FXGB.L.
Find the right allocation for 0GGH.L and FXGB.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer