FXGB.L vs. CIBR.L

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

FXGB.L (First Trust FactorFX UCITS ETF Class B GBP) and CIBR.L (First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation) are both exchange-traded funds - FXGB.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the First Trust FactorFX UCITS ETF Class B GBP, while CIBR.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FXGB.L returned 5.06%/yr vs 14.14%/yr for CIBR.L. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

FXGB.L vs. CIBR.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in First Trust FactorFX UCITS ETF Class B GBP (FXGB.L) and First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation (CIBR.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

FXGB.L is traded in GBp, while CIBR.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CIBR.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FXGB.L achieves a 6.36% return, which is significantly lower than CIBR.L's 29.12% return.

FXGB.L

• 1D: 1.17%
• 1M: 1.83%
• 6M: 6.32%
• YTD: 6.36%
• 1Y: 11.05%
• 3Y*: 6.35%
• 5Y*: 5.06%
• 10Y*: —

CIBR.L

• 1D: -2.98%
• 1M: 7.46%
• 6M: 29.82%
• YTD: 29.12%
• 1Y: 24.86%
• 3Y*: 23.66%
• 5Y*: 14.14%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FXGB.L vs. CIBR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FXGB.L First Trust FactorFX UCITS ETF Class B GBP	6.36%	7.73%	5.81%	10.67%	-1.83%	-2.87%	4.33%
CIBR.L First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation	29.12%	-0.08%	21.02%	33.81%	-18.91%	20.71%	28.04%

Correlation

The correlation between FXGB.L and CIBR.L is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.03
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.03
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.11
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 20, 2020	0.13

The correlation between FXGB.L and CIBR.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.13 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FXGB.L vs. CIBR.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FXGB.L

FXGB.L Risk / Return Rank: 42
FXGB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
FXGB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
FXGB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 32
FXGB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
FXGB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 52

CIBR.L

CIBR.L Risk / Return Rank: 30
CIBR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
CIBR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
CIBR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 34
CIBR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
CIBR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FXGB.L vs. CIBR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust FactorFX UCITS ETF Class B GBP (FXGB.L) and First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation (CIBR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FXGB.L	CIBR.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.99	0.92	+0.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.46	1.41	+0.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.19	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.54	1.02	+1.52
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.10	2.28	+4.82

FXGB.L vs. CIBR.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FXGB.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is comparable to the CIBR.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FXGB.L and CIBR.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FXGB.L vs. CIBR.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXGB.L drawdown since its inception was -9.43%, smaller than the maximum CIBR.L drawdown of -26.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXGB.L and CIBR.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	FXGB.L	CIBR.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.43%	-26.65%	+17.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.33%	-24.30%	+19.97%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.86%	-25.48%	+18.62%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-7.83%	-26.65%	+18.82%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.01%	-2.98%	+2.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.72%	-9.11%	+6.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.55%	10.87%	-9.32%

Volatility

FXGB.L vs. CIBR.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust FactorFX UCITS ETF Class B GBP (FXGB.L) is 2.78%, while First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation (CIBR.L) has a volatility of 8.45%. This indicates that FXGB.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIBR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FXGB.L	CIBR.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.78%	8.45%	-5.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.42%	23.97%	-15.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.11%	27.01%	-15.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.87%	24.05%	-16.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.76%	23.70%	-16.94%

Dividends

FXGB.L vs. CIBR.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither FXGB.L nor CIBR.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FXGB.L and CIBR.L in my portfolio?

FXGB.L and CIBR.L have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

What is the main difference between FXGB.L and CIBR.L?

FXGB.L is categorized as Global Equities, while CIBR.L is Technology Equities. FXGB.L tracks First Trust FactorFX UCITS ETF Class B GBP, while CIBR.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD.