PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
0GGH.L vs. AEGG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

0GGH.L vs. AEGG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (0GGH.L) and iShares Global Aggregate Bond ESG UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (AEGG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

0GGH.L is traded in EUR, while AEGG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the AEGG.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 0GGH.L achieves a -0.41% return, which is significantly lower than AEGG.L's 3.05% return.


0GGH.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.61%
6M
-0.61%
YTD
-0.41%
1Y
1.03%
3Y*
2.12%
5Y*
-1.53%
10Y*

AEGG.L

1D
-0.18%
1M
1.15%
6M
2.36%
YTD
3.05%
1Y
4.58%
3Y*
4.13%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

0GGH.L vs. AEGG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
0GGH.L
iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc)
-0.41%2.71%1.27%4.35%-13.33%
AEGG.L
iShares Global Aggregate Bond ESG UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc)
3.05%-1.00%8.03%7.79%-17.29%

Correlation

The correlation between 0GGH.L and AEGG.L is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2022

0.54

The correlation between 0GGH.L and AEGG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

0GGH.L vs. AEGG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

0GGH.L
0GGH.L Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
0GGH.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
0GGH.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
0GGH.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
0GGH.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
0GGH.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

AEGG.L
AEGG.L Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
AEGG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AEGG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
AEGG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
AEGG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
AEGG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

0GGH.L vs. AEGG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (0GGH.L) and iShares Global Aggregate Bond ESG UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (AEGG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


0GGH.LAEGG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.16

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.37

2.03

-1.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.93

5.10

-4.17

0GGH.L vs. AEGG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 0GGH.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.31, which is lower than the AEGG.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 0GGH.L and AEGG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

0GGH.L vs. AEGG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 0GGH.L drawdown since its inception was -21.17%, which is greater than AEGG.L's maximum drawdown of -19.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 0GGH.L and AEGG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


0GGH.LAEGG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.17%

-19.12%

-2.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.80%

-2.25%

-0.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.90%

-6.22%

+2.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.63%

-1.74%

-10.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.73%

-8.47%

-0.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.10%

0.90%

+0.20%

Volatility

0GGH.L vs. AEGG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (0GGH.L) is 0.99%, while iShares Global Aggregate Bond ESG UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (AEGG.L) has a volatility of 1.38%. This indicates that 0GGH.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AEGG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


0GGH.LAEGG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.99%

1.38%

-0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.75%

3.54%

-0.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.33%

5.02%

-1.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.28%

7.58%

+16.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.91%

7.58%

+13.33%

0GGH.L vs. AEGG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both 0GGH.L and AEGG.L have an expense ratio of 0.10%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

0GGH.L vs. AEGG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 0GGH.L nor AEGG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


0GGH.L and AEGG.L have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.10% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

0GGH.L and AEGG.L have the same expense ratio: 0.10% per year.

0GGH.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond Index, while AEGG.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg GBP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 0GGH.L and AEGG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer