AEGG.L vs. AGGU.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Global Aggregate Bond ESG UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (AEGG.L) and iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (AGGU.L).
AEGG.L and AGGU.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AEGG.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg GBP. It was launched on Dec 3, 2021. AGGU.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond Index. It was launched on Nov 21, 2017. Both AEGG.L and AGGU.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
AEGG.L vs. AGGU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AEGG.L vs. AGGU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AEGG.L iShares Global Aggregate Bond ESG UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) | -0.07% | 4.36% | 3.07% | 5.65% | -12.74% | -0.69% |
AGGU.L iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF | 1.41% | -2.74% | 5.26% | 1.37% | -1.01% | -2.75% |
Different Trading Currencies
AEGG.L is traded in GBP, while AGGU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the AGGU.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AEGG.L achieves a -0.07% return, which is significantly lower than AGGU.L's 1.41% return.
AEGG.L
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -1.37%
- YTD
- -0.07%
- 6M
- 0.52%
- 1Y
- 3.20%
- 3Y*
- 3.58%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AGGU.L
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- -0.21%
- YTD
- 1.41%
- 6M
- 2.31%
- 1Y
- 0.79%
- 3Y*
- 1.45%
- 5Y*
- 1.39%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AEGG.L vs. AGGU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both AEGG.L and AGGU.L have an expense ratio of 0.10%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
AEGG.L vs. AGGU.L — Risk / Return Rank
AEGG.L
AGGU.L
AEGG.L vs. AGGU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Aggregate Bond ESG UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (AEGG.L) and iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (AGGU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AEGG.L | AGGU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.02 | 0.11 | +0.91 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.51 | 0.21 | +1.30 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.02 | +0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.26 | 0.21 | +1.06 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.50 | 0.36 | +4.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AEGG.L | AGGU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.02 | 0.11 | +0.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.16 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.08 | 0.20 | -0.28 |
Correlation
The correlation between AEGG.L and AGGU.L is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
AEGG.L vs. AGGU.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither AEGG.L nor AGGU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
AEGG.L vs. AGGU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AEGG.L drawdown since its inception was -15.75%, smaller than the maximum AGGU.L drawdown of -17.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AEGG.L and AGGU.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AEGG.L | AGGU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.75% | -15.55% | -0.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.38% | -2.25% | -0.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.91% | -1.61% | -0.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.77% | -3.95% | -3.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.67% | 0.71% | -0.04% |
Volatility
AEGG.L vs. AGGU.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Global Aggregate Bond ESG UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (AEGG.L) is 1.19%, while iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (AGGU.L) has a volatility of 2.64%. This indicates that AEGG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AGGU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AEGG.L | AGGU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.19% | 2.64% | -1.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.91% | 4.98% | -3.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.15% | 7.28% | -4.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.60% | 8.72% | -4.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.60% | 9.09% | -4.49% |