0992.HK vs. XIACY

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Lenovo Group (0992.HK) and Xiaomi Corporation (XIACY).

Performance

0992.HK vs. XIACY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a HK$10,000 investment in Lenovo Group (0992.HK) and Xiaomi Corporation (XIACY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0992.HK vs. XIACY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
0992.HK Lenovo Group	2.59%	-5.39%	-3.95%	78.02%	-24.59%	1.59%
XIACY Xiaomi Corporation	-18.22%	15.46%	117.04%	45.73%	-42.32%	-33.06%

Different Trading Currencies

0992.HK is traded in HKD, while XIACY is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XIACY values have been converted to HKD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 0992.HK achieves a 2.59% return, which is significantly higher than XIACY's -18.22% return.

0992.HK

• 1D: 3.83%
• 1M: 0.32%
• YTD: 2.59%
• 6M: -17.75%
• 1Y: -7.88%
• 3Y*: 7.77%
• 5Y*: 1.59%
• 10Y*: 10.02%

XIACY

• 1D: -1.20%
• 1M: -3.30%
• YTD: -18.22%
• 6M: -41.21%
• 1Y: -30.85%
• 3Y*: 38.49%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

0992.HK vs. XIACY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

0992.HK

0992.HK Risk / Return Rank: 29
0992.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
0992.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
0992.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 30
0992.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
0992.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 28

XIACY

XIACY Risk / Return Rank: 14
XIACY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
XIACY Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
XIACY Omega Ratio Rank: 15
XIACY Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
XIACY Martin Ratio Rank: 14

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

0992.HK vs. XIACY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lenovo Group (0992.HK) and Xiaomi Corporation (XIACY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	0992.HK	XIACY	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.19	-0.66	+0.47
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.03	-0.78	+0.81
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.00	0.91	+0.10
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.43	-0.70	+0.28
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.76	-1.29	+0.52
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

0992.HK vs. XIACY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 0992.HK Sharpe Ratio is -0.19, which is higher than the XIACY Sharpe Ratio of -0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 0992.HK and XIACY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	0992.HK	XIACY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.19	-0.66	+0.47
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.04	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.26	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.20	0.06	+0.14

Correlation

The correlation between 0992.HK and XIACY is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

0992.HK vs. XIACY - Dividend Comparison

0992.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.21%, while XIACY has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
0992.HK Lenovo Group	3.21%	3.29%	3.82%	3.48%	5.93%	3.57%	3.84%	5.37%	5.01%	6.01%	5.64%	3.37%
XIACY Xiaomi Corporation	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

0992.HK vs. XIACY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 0992.HK drawdown since its inception was -89.83%, which is greater than XIACY's maximum drawdown of -70.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 0992.HK and XIACY.

Drawdown Indicators

	0992.HK	XIACY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-89.83%	-70.71%	-19.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-31.21%	-49.29%	+18.08%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-47.99%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-49.03%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-28.06%	-48.18%	+20.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-51.28%	-38.43%	-12.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	19.43%	26.81%	-7.38%

Volatility

0992.HK vs. XIACY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lenovo Group (0992.HK) is 10.64%, while Xiaomi Corporation (XIACY) has a volatility of 13.41%. This indicates that 0992.HK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XIACY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	0992.HK	XIACY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.64%	13.41%	-2.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.80%	28.40%	-5.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	41.92%	47.28%	-5.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	43.10%	46.78%	-3.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	38.95%	46.78%	-7.83%

Financials