0700.HK vs. XLM-USD
0700.HK (Tencent Holdings Ltd) is a stock, while XLM-USD (Stellar) is a cryptocurrency. Over the past 10 years, 0700.HK returned 12.18%/yr vs 60.63%/yr for XLM-USD. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
0700.HK vs. XLM-USD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
0700.HK is traded in HKD, while XLM-USD is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XLM-USD values have been converted to HKD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 0700.HK achieves a -21.70% return, which is significantly lower than XLM-USD's -4.80% return. Over the past 10 years, 0700.HK has underperformed XLM-USD with an annualized return of 12.18%, while XLM-USD has yielded a comparatively higher 60.63% annualized return.
0700.HK
- 1D
- 1.40%
- 1M
- 1.91%
- YTD
- -21.70%
- 6M
- -23.86%
- 1Y
- -8.04%
- 3Y*
- 11.44%
- 5Y*
- -2.55%
- 10Y*
- 12.18%
XLM-USD
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 16.98%
- YTD
- -4.80%
- 6M
- -19.94%
- 1Y
- -27.38%
- 3Y*
- 33.79%
- 5Y*
- -11.01%
- 10Y*
- 60.63%
0700.HK vs. XLM-USD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0700.HK Tencent Holdings Ltd | -21.70% | 44.90% | 43.26% | -6.79% | -24.29% | -18.77% | 50.62% | 19.98% | -22.47% | 114.55% |
XLM-USD Stellar | -4.80% | -39.43% | 154.61% | 79.27% | -72.80% | 109.81% | 183.48% | -60.57% | -64.70% | 12,634.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between 0700.HK and XLM-USD is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2014 | 0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
0700.HK vs. XLM-USD — Risk / Return Rank
0700.HK
XLM-USD
0700.HK vs. XLM-USD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tencent Holdings Ltd (0700.HK) and Stellar (XLM-USD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| 0700.HK | XLM-USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.01 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.23 | -0.38 | +0.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.49 | -0.55 | +0.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
0700.HK vs. XLM-USD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 0700.HK drawdown since its inception was -72.79%, smaller than the maximum XLM-USD drawdown of -96.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 0700.HK and XLM-USD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 0700.HK | XLM-USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.79% | -96.23% | +23.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.54% | -71.24% | +34.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.54% | -73.67% | +37.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -65.52% | -83.04% | +17.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -72.79% | -96.23% | +23.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.45% | -78.42% | +46.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.72% | -71.46% | +52.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.56% | 50.31% | -33.75% |
Volatility
0700.HK vs. XLM-USD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Tencent Holdings Ltd (0700.HK) is 13.13%, while Stellar (XLM-USD) has a volatility of 39.29%. This indicates that 0700.HK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLM-USD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 0700.HK | XLM-USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.13% | 39.29% | -26.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.71% | 56.76% | -33.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.61% | 71.15% | -41.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.19% | 73.22% | -34.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.55% | 127.26% | -91.71% |
Frequently Asked Questions
0700.HK and XLM-USD have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for 0700.HK and XLM-USD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer