PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
^TYX vs. GC=F
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

^TYX vs. GC=F - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Treasury Yield 30 Years (^TYX) and Gold (GC=F). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

^TYX vs. GC=F - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
^TYX
Treasury Yield 30 Years
1.03%1.13%19.08%1.11%108.66%15.74%-31.10%-20.89%10.26%-10.58%
GC=F
Gold
8.72%64.52%27.48%13.34%-0.43%-3.47%24.59%18.87%-2.14%13.59%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^TYX achieves a 1.03% return, which is significantly lower than GC=F's 8.72% return. Over the past 10 years, ^TYX has underperformed GC=F with an annualized return of 6.48%, while GC=F has yielded a comparatively higher 14.46% annualized return.


^TYX

1D
-0.20%
1M
4.00%
YTD
1.03%
6M
4.15%
1Y
7.40%
3Y*
10.30%
5Y*
15.88%
10Y*
6.48%

GC=F

1D
-1.68%
1M
-7.92%
YTD
8.72%
6M
22.48%
1Y
49.77%
3Y*
33.33%
5Y*
22.19%
10Y*
14.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

^TYX vs. GC=F — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^TYX
^TYX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
^TYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^TYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
^TYX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
^TYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
^TYX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

GC=F
GC=F Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
GC=F Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GC=F Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
GC=F Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
GC=F Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
GC=F Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

^TYX vs. GC=F - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Treasury Yield 30 Years (^TYX) and Gold (GC=F). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


^TYXGC=FDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.50

1.72

-1.22

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.84

2.13

-1.29

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.32

-0.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.22

2.64

-2.42

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.42

9.67

-9.24

^TYX vs. GC=F - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ^TYX Sharpe Ratio is 0.50, which is lower than the GC=F Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^TYX and GC=F, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


^TYXGC=FDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

1.72

-1.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

1.23

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

0.88

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.03

0.64

-0.66

Correlation

The correlation between ^TYX and GC=F is -0.15. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Drawdowns

^TYX vs. GC=F - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^TYX drawdown since its inception was -88.52%, which is greater than GC=F's maximum drawdown of -44.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^TYX and GC=F.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


^TYXGC=FDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.52%

-44.36%

-44.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.83%

-17.73%

+6.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.52%

-20.43%

-10.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.86%

-20.87%

-51.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-40.07%

-11.58%

-28.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-46.00%

-13.03%

-32.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.65%

4.83%

+0.82%

Volatility

^TYX vs. GC=F - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Treasury Yield 30 Years (^TYX) is 4.22%, while Gold (GC=F) has a volatility of 11.34%. This indicates that ^TYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GC=F based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


^TYXGC=FDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.22%

11.34%

-7.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.18%

24.65%

-16.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.37%

27.83%

-13.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.35%

17.97%

+7.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.22%

16.37%

+16.85%